lable cores seems to be wasted capacity, no?
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-Questions-for-MultiCore-Setup-tp2309443p2363396.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Lance Norskog
goks...@gmail.com
the syntax of specifying alternative shards for
> failover due to performance-reasons, because querying 2 identical and
> available cores seems to be wasted capacity, no?
>
> Thank you!
>
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-Questions-for
failover due to performance-reasons, because querying 2
>> identical and available cores seems to be wasted capacity, no?
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-Questions-for-MultiCore-Setup-tp2309443p2327089.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
at they are replicas of
> eachother, I should use the syntax of specifying alternative shards for
> failover due to performance-reasons, because querying 2 identical and
> available cores seems to be wasted capacity, no?
>
> Thank you!
>
--
View this message in context:
htt
ntext:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-Questions-for-MultiCore-Setup-tp2309443p2312763.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
llection2
> SWAP core1,core2
> Does core2 now maps to collection1?
>
> Thank you!
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-Questions-for-MultiCore-Setup-tp2309443p2309443.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Lance Norskog
goks...@gmail.com
u!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-Questions-for-MultiCore-Setup-tp2309443p2309443.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.