difference in the
> > performance. I do see minor entry in the queryfiltercache rate which is a
> > meager 0.02.
> >
> > I'm really struggling to figure out the bottleneck, any known pain
> points I
> > should be checking ?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-Performance-Issue-tp4095971p4096277.html
> > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
ge in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-Performance-Issue-tp4095971p4096277.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-Performance-Issue-tp4095971p4096277.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-Performance-Issue-tp4095971p4096123.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Query result cache hit might be low due to using NOW in bf. NOW is always
translated to current time and that of course changes from ms to ms... :)
Primoz
From: Shamik Bandopadhyay
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: 17.10.2013 00:14
Subject:SolrCloud Performance Issue
Hi,
I'm in the process of transitioning to SolrCloud from a conventional
Master-Slave model. I'm using Solr 4.4 and has set-up 2 shards with 1
replica each. I've 3 zookeeper ensemble. All the nodes are running on AWS
EC2 instances. Shards are on m1.xlarge and sharing a zookeeper instance
(mounte
ork.
Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Shamik
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-Performance-Issue-tp4095940.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
