Well, I do have to question why you need to do anything.
Just don't send updates to the remote machines..
But do remember that all nodes in SolrCloud can be equal,
which is one of the points.
FWIW,
Erick
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Uwe Reh wrote:
> F***, this is the answer, I was
F***, this is the answer, I was afraid of. ;-)
I hoped, there could be anything, similar to
http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/trunk/zookeeperObservers.html.
Nevertheless, thank you.
Uwe
Am 04.11.2013 14:14, schrieb Erick Erickson:
In this situation, I'd consider going with the older master/slav
In this situation, I'd consider going with the older master/slave
setup. The problem is that in SolrCloud, you have a lot of chatter
back and forth. Presumably the connection to your local instances
is rather slow, so if you're adding data to your index, each and
every add has to be communicated in
Hi,
as service provider for libraries we run a small cloud (1 collection, 1
shard, 3 replicas). To improve the local reliability we want to offer
the possibility to set up own local replicas.
As fas as I know, this can be easily done just by adding a new node to
the cloud. But the external no
