On 10/15/2012 12:38 PM, Alan Woodward wrote:
See discussion on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3843, this was
apparently intentional.
That also links to the following:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrConfigXml#codecFactory, which suggests you need
to use solr.SchemaCodecFactory for
See discussion on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3843, this was
apparently intentional.
That also links to the following:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrConfigXml#codecFactory, which suggests you need
to use solr.SchemaCodecFactory for per-field codecs - this might solve your
post
>
> This should not be required, because I am building from source. I compiled
> Solr from lucene-solr source checked out from branch_4x. I grepped the
> entire tree for lucene-codec and found nothing.
>
> It turns out that running 'ant generate-maven-artifacts' created the jar file
> -- al
On 10/15/2012 2:47 AM, Alan Woodward wrote:
The extra codecs are supplied in a separate jar file now
(lucene-codecs-4.0.0.jar) - I guess this isn't being packaged into solr.war by
default? You should be able to download it here:
http://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=org/apache/lucene
The extra codecs are supplied in a separate jar file now
(lucene-codecs-4.0.0.jar) - I guess this isn't being packaged into solr.war by
default? You should be able to download it here:
http://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=org/apache/lucene/lucene-codecs/4.0.0/lucene-codecs-4.0.0-javad
On 10/14/2012 3:21 PM, Rafał Kuć wrote:
Hello!
Try adding the following to solrconfig.xml:
I did this and got a little further, but still no go. From what it's
saying now, I don't think it will be possible in the current state of
branch_4x to use anything but the default.
SEVERE: null:j
Hello!
Try adding the following to solrconfig.xml:
--
Regards,
Rafał Kuć
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch - ElasticSearch
> On 10/14/2012 12:19 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
>> There is a bit more info in this post, look for "alternative codecs":
>>
>> http://searchhu
On 10/14/2012 12:19 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
There is a bit more info in this post, look for "alternative codecs":
http://searchhub.org/dev/2012/10/12/apache-solr-and-lucene-4-0-0-released/
I'm running on branch_4x checked out yesterday at 13:59 MDT. I tried
postingsFormat="Block" and "Bl
On 10/14/2012 12:19 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
There is a bit more info in this post, look for "alternative codecs":
http://searchhub.org/dev/2012/10/12/apache-solr-and-lucene-4-0-0-released/
If I were to add this to the Solr wiki as potential options under
postingsFormat, would it be correc
There is a bit more info in this post, look for "alternative codecs":
http://searchhub.org/dev/2012/10/12/apache-solr-and-lucene-4-0-0-released/
wunder
On Oct 13, 2012, at 10:46 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> The wiki page for schema.xml shows the syntax for postingsFormat in a schema
> fieldType d
The wiki page for schema.xml shows the syntax for postingsFormat in a
schema fieldType definition, but it doesn't tell you what to use for the
value. Also, the example configs in the solr download do not include
this parameter.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Data_Types
For some fields
11 matches
Mail list logo
