RE: Solr Wildcard Search

2017-11-30 Thread Allison, Timothy B.
solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Solr Wildcard Search At the very least the English possessive filter, which you have. Great! Depending on what your query log analysis finds -- perhaps users are pretty much only searching on nouns? -- you might consider EnglishMinimalStemFilterFactory.

RE: Solr Wildcard Search

2017-11-30 Thread Allison, Timothy B.
ircumstances. Good luck finding the name "newing". -Original Message- From: Georgy Nevsky [mailto:gnevsky.cn...@thomasnet.com] Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 8:31 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Solr Wildcard Search I understand stemming reason. Thank you. Wha

RE: Solr Wildcard Search

2017-11-30 Thread Georgy Nevsky
vember 30, 2017 8:25 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Solr Wildcard Search The initial question wasn't about a phrasal search, but I largely agree that diff q parsers handle the analysis chain differently for multiterms. Yes, Porter is crazily aggressive. USE WITH CAUTION! As

RE: Solr Wildcard Search

2017-11-30 Thread Allison, Timothy B.
27;t find it. It would find "shippqrs" because porter wouldn't know what to do with that 😊 Again, Porter can be very dangerous if it doesn't align with user expectations. -Original Message- From: Atita Arora [mailto:atitaar...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 3

Re: Solr Wildcard Search

2017-11-30 Thread Atita Arora
ion parameters are default > to > Apache Solr 7.1.0. > > In the best we trust > Georgy Nevsky > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rick Leir [mailto:rl...@leirtech.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 7:32 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject

RE: Solr Wildcard Search

2017-11-30 Thread Georgy Nevsky
ache Solr 7.1.0. In the best we trust Georgy Nevsky -Original Message- From: Rick Leir [mailto:rl...@leirtech.com] Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 7:32 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr Wildcard Search George, When you get those results it could be due to stemming.

Re: Solr Wildcard Search

2017-11-30 Thread Rick Leir
e the analysis tab to understand what is going on. If you still have doubts, tell us more about your config. Cheers --Rick On November 30, 2017 7:06:42 AM EST, Georgy Nevsky wrote: >Can somebody help me understand how Solr Wildcard Search is working? > >If I’m doing search for “s

Solr Wildcard Search

2017-11-30 Thread Georgy Nevsky
Can somebody help me understand how Solr Wildcard Search is working? If I’m doing search for “ship*” term I’m getting in result many strings, like “Shipping Weight”, “Ship From”, “Shipping Calculator”, etc. But if I’m searching for “shipp*” I don’t get any result. In the best we trust Georgy

Re: Solr Wildcard Search for large amount of text

2015-06-27 Thread Jack Krupansky
an" > > However, I have a large amount of text out there which requires wildcard > search and it's not viable to use EdgeNGrameFilterFactory as the amount of > processing will be too huge. Do you have any suggestions/advice please? > > Thank you so much for your time! > >

Re: Solr Wildcard Search for large amount of text

2015-06-27 Thread Erick Erickson
Try it and see ;). My experience is that wildcards work fine, although what "fine" is up to you to decide _if_ you restrict it to requiring at least two leading "real" characters, and I actually prefer three. I.e. ab* or abc*. Note that if you require leading wildcards, use the reverse wildcard fi

Re: Solr Wildcard Search for large amount of text

2015-06-27 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 6/27/2015 4:27 AM, octopus wrote: > Hi, I'm looking at Solr's features for wildcard search used for a large > amount of text. I read on the net that solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory is used > to generate tokens for wildcard searching. > > For Nigerian => "ni", "nig", "nige", "niger", "nigeri", "nig

Re: Solr Wildcard Search for large amount of text

2015-06-27 Thread Upayavira
ll be too huge. Do you have any suggestions/advice please? > > Thank you so much for your time! > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Wildcard-Search-for-large-amount-of-text-tp4214392.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Solr Wildcard Search for large amount of text

2015-06-27 Thread octopus
e? Thank you so much for your time! -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Wildcard-Search-for-large-amount-of-text-tp4214392.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solr wildcard search

2013-09-14 Thread Erick Erickson
: Prasi S > Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 6:37 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Solr wildcard search > > > Hi all, > I am working with wildcard queries and few things are confusing. > > 1. Does a wildcard search omit the analysers on a particular field

Solr wildcard search

2013-09-13 Thread Prasi S
Hi all, I am working with wildcard queries and few things are confusing. 1. Does a wildcard search omit the analysers on a particular field? 2. I have searched for q=google\ technology - >gives result q=google technology -> Gives results q=google tech* -> gives results q=google\ tech* -> 0 resu

Re: Solr wildcard search

2013-09-13 Thread Jack Krupansky
@lucene.apache.org Subject: Solr wildcard search Hi all, I am working with wildcard queries and few things are confusing. 1. Does a wildcard search omit the analysers on a particular field? 2. I have searched for q=google\ technology - >gives result q=google technology -> Gives results q=googl