That's really good and helpful info, thank you. Perfect.
Best wishes,
Edd
On Mon, 28 Sep 2020, 5:53 pm Shawn Heisey, wrote:
> On 9/28/2020 8:56 AM, Edward Turner wrote:
> > By removing the copyfields, we've found that our index sizes have reduced
> > by ~40% in some cases, which is great! We'r
On 9/28/2020 8:56 AM, Edward Turner wrote:
By removing the copyfields, we've found that our index sizes have reduced
by ~40% in some cases, which is great! We're just curious now as to exactly
how this can be ...
That's not surprising.
My question is, given the following two schemas, if we in
Fields are placed in the index totally separately from each
other, so it’s no wonder that removing
the copyField results in this kind of savings.
And they have to be separate. Consider what comes out of the end of the
analysis chain. The same input could produce totally different output.
As a tri
Hi all,
We have recently switched to using edismax + qf fields, and no longer use
copyfields to allow us to easily search over values in multiple fields (by
copying multiple fields' values to the copyfield destinations, and then
performing queries over the destination field).
By removing the copy
