e to me. That alone would return the more relevant
> items
> >> at the top but once we do a query boost on inventory, wouldn't jeans
> (using
> >> the aforementioned example) with more inventory that boots appear at
> top.
> >>
> >>
> >>
once we do a query boost on inventory, wouldn't jeans (using
>> the aforementioned example) with more inventory that boots appear at top.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-sorting-and-relevance-tp4
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-sorting-and-relevance-tp4051918p4052122.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
relevant items
at the top but once we do a query boost on inventory, wouldn't jeans (using
the aforementioned example) with more inventory that boots appear at top.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-sorting-and-relevance-tp4051918p4052122.html
Sent fro
plained the problem enough for you to get the gist of what
> I
> am trying to accomplish.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-sorting-and-relevance-tp4051918.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
for you to get the gist of what I
am trying to accomplish.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-sorting-and-relevance-tp4051918.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.