I want to write a custom Solr query and sorting and when I am calling
http://127.0.0.1:8983/solr/techproducts/select?q={!myparsername}12&sort=uid
desc, some of the section as marked is not getting called.
Issue: Documentation of solr customization is pretty poor
Help: Can you please tell why my c
Subject: Re: problem with Solr Sorting by score and distance together
Hi Deepak, As Shawn mentioned, switch your q and fq values above like
q=facilityName:"orthodontist"+OR+facilityName:*orthodontist*
+OR+facilityName:"paul"+OR+facilityName:*paul*+OR+facilityName:*pa
[provider_collection]
> webapp=/solr path=/admin/ping params={wt=javabin&version=2} status=0 QTime=0
> 2018-01-05 00:13:06.891 INFO (qtp1348949648-19) [ x:yelp_collection]
> o.a.s.c.S.Request [yelp_collection] webapp=/solr path=/admin/ping
> params={wt=javabin&version=2} hit
on] webapp=/solr path=/admin/ping
params={wt=javabin&version=2} hits=13 status=0 QTime=0
2018-01-05 00:13:06.891 INFO (qtp1348949648-19) [ x:yelp_collection]
o.a.s.c.S.Request [yelp_collection] webapp=/solr path=/admin/ping
params={wt=javabin&version=2} status=0 QTime=0
Request you to
On 1/3/2018 6:16 PM, Deepak Udapudi wrote:
Assume that, I am searching for car care centers. Solr collection has the data
for all the major car care centers. As an example I search for Firestone car
care centers in a 5 miles radius. In the search results I am supposed to
receive the firestone
Hi all,
Problem :-
Assume that, I am searching for car care centers. Solr collection has the data
for all the major car care centers. As an example I search for Firestone car
care centers in a 5 miles radius. In the search results I am supposed to
receive the firestone car care centers list w
Hi all,
Problem :-
Assume that, I am searching for car care centers. Solr collection has the data
for all the major car care centers. As an example I search for Firestone car
care centers in a 5 miles radius. In the search results I am supposed to
receive the firestone car care centers list w
Anyone with any ideas?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-sorting-situation-tp4091966p4092688.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Type desc,ProductHasPrinciples desc, price
asc?
Which also didnt work, cause it breaks the second rule "Price ascending
sorting"
Any ideas/suggestions?
Thanks :)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-sorting-situation-tp4091966.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Good Morning All,
The alphabetical sorting is causing slight issues as below:
I have 3 documents with title value as below:
1) "Acer Palmatum (Tree)"
2) "Aceraceae (Tree Family)"
3) "Acer Pseudoplatanus (Tree)"
I have created title_sort field which is defined with field type as
alphaNumericalSo
as something to do with it, but I don't know how to use it.
Any help will be greatly appreciated!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Sorting-Not-working-properly-tp4055052.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
e to me. That alone would return the more relevant
> items
> >> at the top but once we do a query boost on inventory, wouldn't jeans
> (using
> >> the aforementioned example) with more inventory that boots appear at
> top.
> >>
> >>
> >>
once we do a query boost on inventory, wouldn't jeans (using
>> the aforementioned example) with more inventory that boots appear at top.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-sorting-and-relevance-tp4
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-sorting-and-relevance-tp4051918p4052122.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
relevant items
at the top but once we do a query boost on inventory, wouldn't jeans (using
the aforementioned example) with more inventory that boots appear at top.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-sorting-and-relevance-tp4051918p4052122.html
Sent fro
plained the problem enough for you to get the gist of what
> I
> am trying to accomplish.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-sorting-and-relevance-tp4051918.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Joel Bernstein
Professional Services LucidWorks
for you to get the gist of what I
am trying to accomplish.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-sorting-and-relevance-tp4051918.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
, Can anyone helpme to get rid out of this problem...
> Thanks in Advance
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Sorting-is-not-working-properly-on-long-Fields-tp4050833.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Yes I did.. But there is no change in result..
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-sorting-is-not-working-properly-on-long-Fields-tp4050834p4050844.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 24 March 2013 11:56, ballusethuraman wrote:
> Hi, I am having a column named 'Kilometers' and when I try to sort with that
> it is not working properly.
[...]
> Initially Kilometers column was having string as datatype and I thought the
> problem could be because of that and i changed the datat
4
5
Datatypes that I have tried are,
Can anyone helpme to get rid out of this problem... Thanks in Advance
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-sorting-is-not-working-properly-on-long-Fields-tp4050834.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
rid out of this problem...
Thanks in Advance
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Sorting-is-not-working-properly-on-long-Fields-tp4050833.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
How to specify a range using if query ?
please help me in re-framing this using if query
sort=map(sum(SCORE,11),77,77,sum(SCORE,33),sum(SCORE,44))
desc
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/complex-Solr-Sorting-Expression-in-4-0-alpha-tp4010160p4010188.html
rt to "if" functions.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: lavesh
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 9:58 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: complex Solr Sorting Expression in 4.0 alpha
I want to perform complex sorting expression for which i have upgraded to
solr-apl
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/complex-Solr-Sorting-Expression-in-4-0-alpha-tp4010160.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>Are you using a TrieDateField for the dates?
Yes
>Consider creating and re-using a filter for the keywords and let the
>query consist of the date range only.
In this case, do I have to configure any cache or solr's default
configurations are enough?
>Guessing here: You request all the results fr
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:00 +0200, Amey Patil wrote:
> Our solr index (Solr 3.4) has over 100 million docuemnts.
[...]
> *((keyword1 AND keyword2...) OR (keyword3 AND keyword4...) OR ...) AND
> date:[date1 TO *]*
> No. of keywords can be in the range of 100 - 1000.
> We are adding sort parameter *'
Our solr index (Solr 3.4) has over 100 million docuemnts.
We frequently fire one type of query on this index to get documents, do
some processing and dump in another index.
Query is of the form -
*((keyword1 AND keyword2...) OR (keyword3 AND keyword4...) OR ...) AND
date:[date1 TO *]*
No. of keywo
Boom!
This works: sort=map(query($qq,-1),0, ,
1)+desc,score+desc&qq=domain:domainA
Thanks,
Mike
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Mike Austin wrote:
> I have content that I index for several different domains. What I'd like
> to do is have all search results found for domainA returned
I have content that I index for several different domains. What I'd like
to do is have all search results found for domainA returned first and
results for domainB,C,D..etc.. returned second. I could do two different
searches but was wondering if there was a way to only do one query but
return res
Was that field multivalued="true" earlier by any chance??? Did you rebuild
the index from scratch after changing it to multivalued="false" ???
Regards
Pravesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-sorting-issue-can-not-sort-
Hi,
I am getting this weird error message `can not sort on multivalued
field: fieldname` on all the indexed fields. This is the full error message
from solr
HTTP Status 400 - can not sort on multivalued field:
pricetype Status reportmessagecan not
sort on multivalued field: pricedescripti
: sort=query({!v="area_id: 78153"}) desc, score desc
:
: What I want to achieve is sort by if there is a match with area_id, then
: sort by the actual score
I think you can use the "map" function here to map all scores greater then
zero (matching docs) to some fixed value. something like this
.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on
>
> Cache could not be a problem as it did not fetch any records from the very
> begining.
>
> So, basically it does not fetch any documents/records whereas it does index
> them.
>
> Thanks
> Pratik
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-sorting-problem-tp486144p2889075.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Hi,
Were you able to sort the results using alphaOnlySort ?
If yes what changes were made to the schema and data-config ?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-sorting-problem-tp486144p2889473.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
So, basically it does not fetch any documents/records whereas it does index
them.
Thanks
Pratik
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-sorting-problem-tp486144p2889075.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
on't work
>
> Thanks --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-sorting-problem-tp486144p2886248.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Lance Norskog
goks...@gmail.com
ColXYZ
My data-config looks like :-
In which scenarios would SOLR index the records/documents but the search
won't work
Thanks --
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-sorting-problem-tp486144p2886248.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Folks,
I got a problem on solr sorting as below:
sort=query({!v="area_id: 78153"}) desc, score desc
What I want to achieve is sort by if there is a match with area_id, then
sort by the actual score
problem is, area_id is a multiple value, the result I am getting does not
sort by
ng alphaname ... i get this error :-
> The field :foodDesc present in DataConfig does not have a counterpart in
> Solr Schema
>
> Please help
>
> Thanks
> Pratik
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-sorting-problem-tp486144p2851229.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
name "foodDescUS" to "alphaname".
When i try to sort using alphaname ... i get this error :-
The field :foodDesc present in DataConfig does not have a counterpart in
Solr Schema
Please help
Thanks
Pratik
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.
--- On Mon, 3/14/11, Denis Kuzmenok wrote:
> From: Denis Kuzmenok
> Subject: Re: Solr sorting
> To: "Ahmet Arslan"
> Date: Monday, March 14, 2011, 12:24 PM
>
> > --- On Mon, 3/14/11, Denis Kuzmenok
> wrote:
>
> >> From: Denis Kuzmenok
> --- On Mon, 3/14/11, Denis Kuzmenok wrote:
>> From: Denis Kuzmenok
>> Subject: Solr sorting
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Date: Monday, March 14, 2011, 10:23 AM
>> Hi.
>> Is there any way to make such scheme working:
>> I have many
--- On Mon, 3/14/11, Denis Kuzmenok wrote:
> From: Denis Kuzmenok
> Subject: Solr sorting
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Monday, March 14, 2011, 10:23 AM
> Hi.
> Is there any way to make such scheme working:
> I have many documents, each
> has a rando
Hi.
Is there any way to make such scheme working:
I have many documents, each has a random field to enable random
sorting, and i have a weight field.
I want to get random results, but documents with bigger weight should
appear more frequently.
Is that possible?
Thanks, in advance.
Savvas-Andreas Moysidis wrote:
> In my understanding sorting on a field for which analysis has yielded
> multiple terms just doesn't make sense..
> If you have document#1 with a field A which has the terms Epsilon, Alpha,
> and document#2 with field A which has the terms Beta, Delta and request
> a
Jonathan Rochkind [rochk...@jhu.edu] wrote:
> I too sometimes have similar use cases, and my best ideas about how to
> solve them involve using faceting --- you can facet on a multi-valued
> field, and you can sort facets--but you can only sort facets by "index
> order", a strict byte-by-byte sort.
You may not sort on a tokenized field. You may not sort on a multiValued
field. You can only have one term in a field.
If there are more search terms than documents, A) sorting doesn't mean
anything and B) Lucene will throw an exception.
Erick Erickson wrote:
In general, the behavior when so
Erick Erickson wrote:
> In general, the behavior when sorting is not predictable when
> sorting on a tokenized field, which "text" is. What would
> it mean to sort on a field with "erick" "Moazzam" as tokens
> in a single document? Should it be in the "e"s or the "m"s?
Might it be possible or reas
In general, the behavior when sorting is not predictable when
sorting on a tokenized field, which "text" is. What would
it mean to sort on a field with "erick" "Moazzam" as tokens
in a single document? Should it be in the "e"s or the "m"s?
That said, you probably want to watch out for case
Be
For anyone who faced the same problem, changing the field to string
from text worked!
-Moazzam
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Moazzam Khan wrote:
> The field type of the first name and last name is text. Could that be
> why it's not sorting properly? I just changed it to string and started
> a
The field type of the first name and last name is text. Could that be
why it's not sorting properly? I just changed it to string and started
a full-import. Hopefully that will work.
Thanks,
Moazzam
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Jayendra Patil
wrote:
> need additional information .
> Sorti
need additional information .
Sorting is easy in Solr just by passing the sort parameter
However, when it comes to text sorting it depends on how you analyse
and tokenize your fields
Sorting does not work on fields with multiple tokens.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FAQ#Why_Isn.27t_Sorting_Worki
Hey guys,
I have a list of people indexed in Solr. I am trying to sort by their
first names but I keep getting results that are not alphabetically
sorted (I see the names starting with W before the names starting with
A). I have a feeling that the results are first being sorted by
relevancy then s
dSource)
>> // Others use implicit ord(...) to generate numeric field value
>> myfield
>>
>> you are correct about 0.5 being the boost, using either the _val_ hack on
>> the SolrQueryParser or using he bf param of dismax the ^0.5 will be used
>> as a boost on the resu
Oh Wow, I didnt know that was the case. I am completely left baffled now. BAck
to square one I guess. :)
> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:31:28 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: RE: Out of memory on Solr sorting> >
> Sundar, very
Sundar, very strange that increase of size/initialSize of LRUCache
helps with OutOfMemoryError...
2048 is number of entries in cache and _not_ 2Gb of memory...
Making size==initialSize of HashMap-based LRUCache would help with
performance anyway; may be with OOMs (probably no need to resize
reinexing, replaving the
text_ws to string and having the default size of all 3 caches to 512 and seeing
if the problem goes away.
-Sundar
> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:05:05 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: Re: Out of memory on Solr sorti
I know, and this is strange... I was guessing filterCache is used
implicitly to get DocSet for token; as Sundar wrote, increase of
LRUCache helped him (he is sorting on 'text-ws' field)
-Fuad
If increasing LRU cache helps you:
- you are probably using 'tokenized' field for sorting (could you
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Fuad Efendi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If increasing LRU cache helps you:
> - you are probably using 'tokenized' field for sorting (could you confirm
> please?)...
Sorting does not utilize any Solr caches.
-Yonik
Best choice for sorting field:
sortMissingLast="true" omitNorms="true">
- case-insentitive etc...
I might be partially wrong about SOLR LRU Cache but it is used somehow
in your specific case... 'filterCache' is probably used for
'tokenized' sorting: it stores (token, DocList)...
My understanding of Lucene Sorting is that it will sort by 'tokens'
and not by 'full fields'... so that for sorting you need 'full-string'
(non-tokenized) field, and to search you need another one tokenized.
For instance, use 'string' for sorting, and 'text_ws' for search; and
use 'copyFiel
The field is of type "text_ws". Is this not recomended. Should I use text
instead?
> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 10:58:35 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Out of memory on Solr sorting> > Hi Sundar,> > > If
> increasi
Hi Sundar,
If increasing LRU cache helps you:
- you are probably using 'tokenized' field for sorting (could you
confirm please?)...
...you should use 'non-tokenized single-valued non-boolean' for better
performance of
sorting...
Fuad Efendi
==
http://www.tokenizer.org
Quo
.
Sundar
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: RE: Out of
> memory on Solr sorting> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:43:05 -0700> > A sneaky
> source of OutOfMemory errors is the permanent generation. If you> add this:>
> -XX:PermSize
that is not reclaimed, and so each undeploy/redeploy cycle
eats up the permanent generation pool.
-Original Message-
From: david w [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 7:20 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Out of memory on Solr sorting
Hi, Daniel
I got the
unning on this
> 2Gb heap VM.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sundar shankar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 July 2008 23:45
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Out of memory on Solr sorting
>
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
have a 3.5 million documents (aprox. 10Gb) running on this
2Gb heap VM.
Cheers,
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: sundar shankar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 July 2008 23:45
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Out of memory on Solr sorting
Hi Daniel,
I am a
-Xmx2048m -XX:MinHeapFreeRatio=50
-XX:NewSize=1024m -XX:NewRatio=2 -Dsun.rmi.dgc.client.gcInterval=360
-Dsun.rmi.dgc.server.gcInterval=360
Jboss 4.05
> Subject: RE: Out of memory on Solr sorting
> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:49:06 +0100
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> T
Sent: 22 July 2008 23:23
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Out of memory on Solr sorting
Yes, it is a cache, it stores "sorted" by "sorted field" array of
Document IDs together with sorted fields; query results can intersect
with it and reorder accordingly.
But memory requirement
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:19:49 +
sundar shankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation mark. The reason I had it as 512 max was cos
> earlier the data file was just about 30 megs and it increased to this much
> for of the usage of EdgeNGramFactoryFilter for 2 fields. Thats gre
t least in case of field level sorting? I could be
wrong too and the implementation might probably be better. But
don't know why all of the fields have had to be loaded.
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:26:26 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject
n might probably be better. But don't
know why all of the fields have had to be loaded.
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:26:26 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: Re: Out of memory on Solr
sorting> > > Ok, after some analysis of Fi
hy all of the fields have had to be loaded.
> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:26:26 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: Re: Out of memory on Solr sorting> > >
> Ok, after some analysis of FieldCacheImpl:> > - it is sup
e. Queries with bigger results
seems to come out fine too. But why just sort of that too
just 10 rows??
-Sundar
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:24:35 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: RE: Out of
memory on Solr sorting> >
hat too
just 10 rows??
-Sundar
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:24:35 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: RE: Out of
memory on Solr sorting> >
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCacheImpl$10.createValue(FieldCacheImpl.ja
Thanks for your help Mark. Lemme explore a little more and see if some one else
can help me out too. :)
> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:53:47 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: Re: Out of memory on Solr sorting> >
> Someone else
. The dev is a linux with over 2 Gigs of memory and 1024 allocated to heap now. :S
-Sundar
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:17:40 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: Re: Out of memory on Solr sorting> > Mark,> > Question: how much memory
ect: Re: Out of memory on Solr sorting> >
> Mark,> > Question: how much memory I need for 25,000,000 docs if I do a sort
> by > field, 256 bytes. 6.4Gb?> > > Quoting Mark Miller <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>:> > > Because to sort efficiently, Solr loads th
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:24:35 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: RE: Out of memory
on Solr sorting> >
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCacheImpl$10.createValue(FieldCacheImpl.java:403)>
> - this piece of code do not request Array[1
ies with bigger results seems
to come out fine too. But why just sort of that too just 10
rows??
-Sundar
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:24:35 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: RE: Out of memory
on Solr sorting> >
org.apac
Mark,
Question: how much memory I need for 25,000,000 docs if I do a sort by
field, 256 bytes. 6.4Gb?
Quoting Mark Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Because to sort efficiently, Solr loads the term to sort on for each
doc in the index into an array. For ints,longs, etc its just an array
the siz
ws??
-Sundar
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:24:35 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: RE: Out of memory on Solr
sorting> >
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCacheImpl$10.createValue(FieldCacheImpl.java:403)>
> - this piece of code d
posted on the turn
arounds.Thanks-Sundar> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:46:04 -0400> From: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: Re: Out of memory on Solr
sorting> > Because to sort efficiently, Solr loads the term to sort on for each
doc > in the ind
solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Out of memory on Solr sorting
>
> Because to sort efficiently, Solr loads the term to sort on for each doc
> in the index into an array. For ints,longs, etc its just an array the
> size of the number of docs in your index (i believe deleted or not). For
Jul 2008 12:24:35 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: RE: Out of memory on Solr
sorting> >
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCacheImpl$10.createValue(FieldCacheImpl.java:403)> > - this piece of code do not request Array[100M] (as I se
igger results seems to come out
fine too. But why just sort of that too just 10 rows??
-Sundar
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:24:35 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: RE: Out of memory on Solr
sorting> >
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCa
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:24:35 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: RE: Out of memory on Solr sorting> > org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCacheImpl$10.createValue(FieldCacheImpl.java:403)> > - this piece of code do not request Array[100M] (as
sort of that too just 10 rows??
-Sundar
> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:24:35 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: RE: Out of memory on Solr sorting> >
> org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCacheImpl$10.createValue(FieldCacheImpl.java:403)>
shankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Out of memory on Solr sorting
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:11:02 +
Hi,
Sorry again fellos. I am not sure whats happening. The day with
solr is bad for me I guess. EZMLM didnt let me send any
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Out of memory on Solr sorting
> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:11:02 +
>
>
> Hi,
> Sorry again fellos. I am not sure whats happening. The day with solr is bad
> for me I guess. EZMLM didnt
Hi,
SOrry again fellos. I am not sure whats happening. The day with solr is bad for
me I guess. EZMLM didnt let me send any mails this morning. Asked me to confirm
subscription and when I did, it said I was already a member. Now my mails are
all coming out bad. Sorry for troubling y'all this ba
e grouped in ascending order. But
> i
> want certain categories to come up first in the sort order. I don't want
> them to be grouped in ascending order. Please shed some light anyone. How
> to
> do it. Is it possible?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.
tain categories to come up first in the sort order. I don't want
them to be grouped in ascending order. Please shed some light anyone. How to
do it. Is it possible?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/solr-sorting-question-tp17498596p17498596.html
Sent from the Solr - Use
riginal Message
>> From: pmg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 10:19:52 PM
>> Subject: Re: solr sorting problem
>>
>>
>> I forgot to mention that I made changes to schema after indexing.
>
e.org
> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 10:19:52 PM
> Subject: Re: solr sorting problem
>
>
> I forgot to mention that I made changes to schema after indexing.
>
>
> pmg wrote:
> >
> > I have problem sorting solr results. Here is my solr confi
>
> select/?&rows=100&start=0&q=artistId:100346%20AND%20type:track&sort=alphaTrackSort%20desc&fl=track
>
> does not sort track.
>
> Don't understand what is missing from config
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/solr-sorting-problem-tp17417394p17417408.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
fig
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/solr-sorting-problem-tp17417394p17417394.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks a ton, that worked
-Original Message-
From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 3:08 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SOLR sorting - question
Kasi Sankaralingam wrote:
> Do I need to select the fields in the query that I
Kasi Sankaralingam wrote:
Do I need to select the fields in the query that I am trying to sort on?, for
example if I want sort on update date then do I need to select that field?
I don't think so... are you getting an error?
I run queries like:
/select?q=*:*&fl=name&sort=added desc
without p
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
