Perfect - got it.
Now I know where I stand when I'm writing the bq, bf, etc...
Thank you very much.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> bq:
>
> My big question however is whether I can
> trust that the Boost Functions and
> Boost Query are running against the entire index
bq:
My big question however is whether I can
trust that the Boost Functions and
Boost Query are running against the entire index
In a word "no". The bf's are intended to alter
the score of the documents found by the primary query
by multiplying the function results by the raw score.
If a documen
Oh - gotcha... Thanks for taking the time to reply. My use of the phrase
"sub query" is probably misleading...
Here's the XML (below). I'm calling the Boost Query and Boost Function
statements "sub queries"...
The thing I was referencing was this -- where I create an "alias" for the
query (tit
John:
I'm not objecting to the XML, but to the very presence of "more than
one query in a request handler". Request handlers don't have, AFAIK,
"query chains". They have a list of defaults for the _single_ query
being sent at a time to that handler. So having
blah blah
is something I've never
Hi Erick -
I was trying to simplify and not waste anyone's time parsing my
requestHandler... That is, as you imply, bogus xml.
The basic question is: If I have two "sub queries" in a single
requestHandler, do they both run independently against the entire index?
Alternatively, is there some ki
Where are you seeing that this does anything? It wouldn't be the first time
new functionality happened that I totally missed, but I've never seen that
config.
You might get some mileage out of ReRankingQParserPlugin though, that runs
the top N queries from one query through another.
Best,
Erick
O
Hi all,
I have a question about whether sub-queries in Solr requestHandlers go
against the total index or against the results of the previous query.
Here's a simple example:
{!edismax qf=blah, blah}
{!edismax qf=blah, blah}
My question is:
What does Query2 run "against
bq: As an aside, it would be nice if the queryparser could do the same
thing in Lucene
Lucene does not and (probably) will not ever know anything about the
schema. It's
purposely unaware of this higher-level construct. I wish you great good luck
persuading the lucene guys to have anything like a s
That's right.
Otis
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Sep 23, 2013 12:55 PM, "Scott Smith" wrote:
> I just want to state a couple of things and hear someone say, "that's
> right".
>
>
> 1. In a solr query you can have multiple fq's, but only a single q.
> And yes, I can
I just want to state a couple of things and hear someone say, "that's right".
1. In a solr query you can have multiple fq's, but only a single q. And
yes, I can simply AND the multiple "q"s together. Just want to avoid that if
I'm wrong.
2. A subtler issue is that when a full que
10 matches
Mail list logo
