uests faster , any inputs on that are welcome.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-grouping-performace-tp4093300p4093311.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-grouping-performace-tp4093300p4093311.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
param.
Bests
Sandro Zbinden
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alok Bhandari [mailto:alokomprakashbhand...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Oktober 2013 12:31
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Solr grouping performace
Hello ,
I am using solr 4.0 , I want to group entries on one of th
-grouping-performace-tp4093300.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
expect results to return in 2-3 seconds? the
> grouping
> field is an "int" , also I want only one filed for a document. I can afford
> t use upto 4GB RAM.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-grouping-performac
for
group.value then can I expect results to return in 2-3 seconds? the grouping
field is an "int" , also I want only one filed for a document. I can afford
t use upto 4GB RAM.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-grouping-performace-tp4082480.html
