x27;.
Indeed, we have 'asynchronous' index for our data via SOLR.
Why real-time??? Why not 'transactional' ;)
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 1:58 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr e Terracotta
Now th
On 12/7/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wonder if the license is compatible with ASD
http://www.terracotta.org/confluence/display/orgsite/Text+of+Terracotta+Public+License
The problematic part might be the attribution requirements.
I have verified (via legal-discuss) that the att
I wonder if the license is compatible with ASD
http://www.terracotta.org/confluence/display/orgsite/Text+of+Terracotta+Public+License
The problematic part might be the attribution requirements.
Otherwise, the ASF board has determined that MPL binaries are OK for
redistribution as long as they hav
ns more or less
> real-time Solr replication would be possible, eliminating the need for the
> Master/Slave setup, shapshots, pull scripts, etc. Ja?
>
> Otis
>
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-e-Terracotta-tf2776395.html#a7745588
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 12/7/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now that Terracotta JVM clustering has been open-sourced (and works with
Lucene's RAMDirectory), who is going to be the first to write something to
support HA Solr? :)
I'm very skeptical of the performance of such a solution.
If I unde
Now that Terracotta JVM clustering has been open-sourced (and works with
Lucene's RAMDirectory), who is going to be the first to write something to
support HA Solr? :)
http://www.terracotta.org/
http://orionl.blogspot.com/
If I understand the significance of this, this means more or less real-t
