On 9/20/07, Walter Ferrara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an index with several fields, but just one stored: ID (string,
> unique).
> I need to access that ID field for each of the tops "nodes" docs in my
> results (this is done inside a handler I wrote), code looks like:
>
> Hits hits =
: Hits hits = searcher.search(query);
: for(int i=0; i
On 9/20/07, Walter Ferrara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm just wondering, as this cached object could be (theoretically)
> pretty big, do I need to be aware of some OOM? I know that FieldCache
> use weakmaps, so I presume the cached array for the older reader(s) will
> be gc-ed when the reader is
About stored/index difference: ID is a string, (= solr.StrField) so
FieldCache give me what I need.
I'm just wondering, as this cached object could be (theoretically)
pretty big, do I need to be aware of some OOM? I know that FieldCache
use weakmaps, so I presume the cached array for the older rea
At 5:30 PM +0200 9/20/07, Walter Ferrara wrote:
>I have an index with several fields, but just one stored: ID (string,
>unique).
>I need to access that ID field for each of the tops "nodes" docs in my
>results (this is done inside a handler I wrote), code looks like:
>
> Hits hits = searcher.se
I have an index with several fields, but just one stored: ID (string,
unique).
I need to access that ID field for each of the tops "nodes" docs in my
results (this is done inside a handler I wrote), code looks like:
Hits hits = searcher.search(query);
for(int i=0; i
