On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 08:17 +0100, Sathya wrote:
> I am running single instance solr and the JVM heap space is minimum 6.3gb
> and maximum 24.31gb. Nothing is running to complete the 24gb except tomcat
> server. I have only 2 copyField entries only.
Your Xmx is the same size as your RAM. It shoul
Shawn
>
>
>
> ------
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Searching-Issue-tp4115207p4115455.html
> To unsubscribe from Solr Searching Issue, click
> her
On 2/4/2014 9:49 PM, Sathya wrote:
> Yes all the instances are reading the same 8GB data at a time. The java
> search programs(> 15 instances) are running in different machines, different
> JVM and they accessing the solr server machine(Ubuntu 64 bit). And the solr
> Index is not shard. The query r
n 5 seconds per
search in single instance).
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Searching-Issue-tp4115207p4115445.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ry 2014 13:24, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> Maybe you need a larger Java heap.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Sathya
> Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2014 6:11 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Solr Searching Issue
>
>
> Hi Frien
Maybe you need a larger Java heap.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Sathya
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2014 6:11 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr Searching Issue
Hi Friends,
I am working in Solr 4.6.0 from last 2 months. i have indexed the data in
solr
t;
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Searching-Issue-tp4115207p4115234.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Hi Furkan,
I have index the subjects that containing only 1 to 10 words per subject.
And query rate is minimum 7 seconds for one searching. And i have single
solr instance only.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Searching-Issue-tp4115207p4115234.html
search query. Its
> getting too slow. Its taking more than 8 hours to search the 7lac data. I
> am
> Using Ubuntu machine with 24GB ram and 1TB HD. Kindly tell me the solution
> to solve this issue.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n
. Its
getting too slow. Its taking more than 8 hours to search the 7lac data. I am
Using Ubuntu machine with 24GB ram and 1TB HD. Kindly tell me the solution
to solve this issue.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Searching-Issue-tp4115207.html
Sent from the
thanks ! I think I fixed the issue and it's doing good :)
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Solr searching issue..
> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:12:00 +
>
> Copy field dest="text&q
ROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: RE: Solr
> searching issue..> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:34:47 +0100> > > again whatever
> I have pasted it didn't work ! .. I have attached the schema.xml file
> instead
again whatever I have pasted it didn't work ! .. I have attached the schema.xml
file instead,,, sorry for spamming you all
thanks
ak
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Solr searching issue..
>
with some strange reason my copy and paste didn't work !!! sorry to terrible
you all.. hope you can see them now..
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Solr searching issue..
> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 20
r-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Solr searching issue..
>
> You can use EdgeNGramTokenizer available with Solr 1.3 to achieve this. But
> I'd think again about introducing this kind of search as n-grams can bloat
> your index size.
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 3
thanks,,
I will give it a try and get back to you
> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:14:11 +0530
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Solr searching issue..
>
> You can use EdgeNGramTokenizer availabl
What was the type of the field that you are using. I guess you could achieve it
by a simple swap of text and string.
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: Solr
> searching issue..> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:28:50 +0100> > > Hi solr-us
You can use EdgeNGramTokenizer available with Solr 1.3 to achieve this. But
I'd think again about introducing this kind of search as n-grams can bloat
your index size.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 3:58 PM, dudes dudes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi solr-users,
>
> version type: nightly build solr-2
Hi solr-users,
version type: nightly build solr-2008-07-07
If I search for name John, it finds it with out any issues On the other
hand if I search for Joh* , it also finds all the possible matches. However, if
I search for "Joh".. it doesn't find any possible match in other word, it
19 matches
Mail list logo
