: Subject: Solr Range Query Anomalities
: In-Reply-To: <42aac72d6e244561cb364739bf3c7517.squir...@webmail01.one.com>
: References: <42aac72d6e244561cb364739bf3c7517.squir...@webmail01.one.com>
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists
When st
SortableDoubleField works excellent, haven't tried TrieField though.
Thanks for the super fast support everyone.
Regards,
Johan
> On Thursday 20 August 2009 16:07, johan.sjob...@findwise.se wrote:
>> we're performing range queries of a field which is of type double. Some
>> queries which should
On Thursday 20 August 2009 16:07, johan.sjob...@findwise.se wrote:
> we're performing range queries of a field which is of type double. Some
> queries which should generate results does not, and I think it's best
> explained by the following examples; it's also expected to exist data in
> all range
Try a sdouble or sfloat field type?
Andrew.
johan.sjoberg wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> we're performing range queries of a field which is of type double. Some
> queries which should generate results does not, and I think it's best
> explained by the following examples; it's also expected to exist data
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 7:37 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we're performing range queries of a field which is of type double. Some
> queries which should generate results does not, and I think it's best
> explained by the following examples; it's also expected to exist data in
> all ranges:
>
>
> ?q=field
Hi,
we're performing range queries of a field which is of type double. Some
queries which should generate results does not, and I think it's best
explained by the following examples; it's also expected to exist data in
all ranges:
?q=field:[10.0 TO 20.0] // OK
?q=field:[9.0 TO 20.0] // NOT OK
?q
