Hi,
Because you went over 31-32 GB heap you lost the benefit of compressed
pointers and even though you gave the JVM more memory the GC may have had
to work harder. This is a relatively well educated guess, which you can
confirm if you run tests and look at GC counts, times, JVM heap memory pool
On 4/17/2015 8:14 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal wrote:
Hi,
As per this article, the linux machine is preferred to have 1.5 times RAM
with respect to index size. So, to verify this, I tried testing the solr
performance in different volumes of RAM allocation keeping other
configuration (i.e Solid Sta
Hi,
This may be irrelevant but your machine configuration reminded me of some
reading I had done some time back on memory vs ssd.
Do a search on solr ssd and you should get some meaningful posts.
Like this one https://sbdevel.wordpress.com/2013/06/06/memory-is-overrated/
Regards
Puneet
On 18 Apr 2
Hi,
As per this article, the linux machine is preferred to have 1.5 times RAM
with respect to index size. So, to verify this, I tried testing the solr
performance in different volumes of RAM allocation keeping other
configuration (i.e Solid State Drives, 8 core processor, 64-Bit) to be same
in bot
