No problem, created this.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3401 and related to 2605.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Stefan Matheis
wrote:
> Jamie, right .. that makes sense. right now the core-admin will not work in
> singlecore-mode because we have no core-name there.
> https://i
Jamie, right .. that makes sense. right now the core-admin will not work in
singlecore-mode because we have no core-name there.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2605 should fix this, afterwards we
can show the core-admin for every configuration. would you mind to open a
ticket for tha
So I believe I see the reason now. Basically in app.js we check to
see if there is more than 1 core deployed to decide if we show the
core admin or not. I am not sure this is intended or not, but I would
think this isn't what we want the default action to be. Shouldn't we
always show the core ad
So, net-net, I think the functionality of core admin is basic enough
to implement a jsp for, though if the velocity thingy works out to the
box, great!
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Patches welcome, though! :)
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
>
> On 12/9/
: Well sure, Solr is no webapp framework. But you can do some things with the
: ShowFileRequestHandler, like have static textual content (like CSS and
While i think it's definitely important to have some basic admin
functionality available in the war, at a certain point we should really
just f
Well sure, Solr is no webapp framework. But you can do some things
with the ShowFileRequestHandler, like have static textual content
(like CSS and JavaScript, or just an HTML page) served up. And you
can simply have a Velocity template with static text in it, and map it
as a request handl
There is a general problem here in that Solr has no configuration for
content management. There is nowhere to throw in images and html pages
as part of your velocity app either.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> After I sent that, though, I realized that the core admin is spe
After I sent that, though, I realized that the core admin is special
in that it isn't within the context of a single core. I'll have to
research this and see, but I suspect there may be an issue with using
VwR for this particular handler, as it wouldn't have a solr-home/conf/
velocity direc
Nice, Erik!
Cheers,
Chris
On 12/9/09 10:39 PM, "Erik Hatcher" wrote:
> Just a note about the hidden gem that I haven't taken as far as I'd
> like...
>
> With the VelocityResponseWriter, it's as easy as creating a Velocity
> template (and wiring in VwR in solrconfig, which I'll set up by
> de
Just a note about the hidden gem that I haven't taken as far as I'd
like...
With the VelocityResponseWriter, it's as easy as creating a Velocity
template (and wiring in VwR in solrconfig, which I'll set up by
default in 1.5). It will even default to the template named after the
handler n
Hi Jason,
Patches welcome, though! :)
Cheers,
Chris
On 12/9/09 10:31 PM, "Shalin Shekhar Mangar" wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Jason Rutherglen <
> jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I assume there isn't one? Anything in the works?
>>
>
> Nope.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shal
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Jason Rutherglen <
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I assume there isn't one? Anything in the works?
>
Nope.
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
I assume there isn't one? Anything in the works?
AIL PROTECTED]>
: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
: To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
: Subject: Re: Solr Core Admin
:
: Ok just FYI solr replaces the file instead of editing. This means that the
: webserver needs permissions in the directory to delete and create the
: solr.xml file. Once I fixe
unsubscribe
> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:29:20 -0800
> Subject: Solr Core Admin
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> I am trying to use the api for the solr cores. Reload works great but when
> I try to UNLOAD I get a massive exception in IOEx
Ok just FYI solr replaces the file instead of editing. This means that the
webserver needs permissions in the directory to delete and create the
solr.xml file. Once I fixed that it no longer gave IOException errors.
On 11/20/08 8:29 AM, "Jeff Newburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying t
I am trying to use the api for the solr cores. Reload works great but when
I try to UNLOAD I get a massive exception in IOException. It seems to
unload the module but doesn¹t remove it from the configuration file. The
solr.xml file is full read and write but still errors. Any ideas?
Solr.xml
s
17 matches
Mail list logo
