ithms twice and adding
it to the resulted cluster? Am I missing something?
Wont it create too many labels if in the worst case none of the cluster
labels match?
P.S Please correct me if I am wrong.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Need-help-in-unde
Thank you Upayavira and Shawn. Yes - the query works correctly using
the standard select. I have a workaround where I simply specify the
fields I want to search in each part of the query and do not specify a
df. Just an FYI in case someone else runs into this.
-Joe
On 7/23/2015 10:51 AM, S
On 7/23/2015 7:51 AM, Joseph Obernberger wrote:
> Hi Upayavira - the URL was:
>
> http://server1:9100/solr/MYCOL1/clustering?q=Collection:(COLLECT1008+OR+COLLECT2587)+AND+(amazon+AND+soap)&wt=json&indent=true&clustering=true&rows=1&df=FULL_DOCUMENT&debugQuery=true
>
>
> Here is the relevant part
I've seen something like this on another system - where the OR is
consumed as a query term rather than an operator.
Remember that Edismax will use the Lucene query parser (which supports
OR, etc) unless there is an exception, and defer to dismax if there is a
syntax error.
What I'd suggest here i
Hi Upayavira - the URL was:
http://server1:9100/solr/MYCOL1/clustering?q=Collection:(COLLECT1008+OR+COLLECT2587)+AND+(amazon+AND+soap)&wt=json&indent=true&clustering=true&rows=1&df=FULL_DOCUMENT&debugQuery=true
Here is the relevant part of the response - notice that the default
field (FULL_DOCU
I'd be curious to see the parsed query that you get when adding
debugQuery=true to the URL. I bet that the clustering component is
extracting terms from the parsed query, and perhaps each of those
queries is parsed in some way differently?
Upayavira
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015, at 08:29 PM, Joseph Obern
Upon further investigation, it looks like it is either ignoring the
default field, or when the default field is specified the rest of the
query is ignored.
Example:
q=Field1:(term1 OR term2) AND (item1 OR item2)&df=Field2
that does not cluster correctly, but this does:
q=Field1:(term1 OR term2)
Hi - I'm using carrot2 inside of solr cloud and have noticed that
queries that involve parenthesis don't seem to work correctly. For
example if I have:
q=Field1:(term1 OR term2) AND Field2:(item1 OR item2)
The clustering seems to ignore the values in parenthesis. If instead I do:
q=(Field1:ter
Though I am interacting with Dawid (creator of Carrot2) on Carrot2 mailing
list however just wanted to post my problem to a wider audience.
I am using Solr 4.7 (on both windows and linux) and saved my
lingo-attributes.xml file from the workbench which I am using in Solr. Note
that for testing I am
loader one month ago).
>
> * I will have tens of thousands of new documents every day and overall
> base of several millions.
>
> I'm reading "Mahout in action" now. But maybe you can point me to what i
> need.
> --- Исходное сообщение ---
> От кого: "Chandan Ta
t;>
>
> true
>
> default
>
> true
>
> subTitle
> anchorUrl
>
>fullSpeechString
>
>true
>
>false
>20
>
>
>
>
> clustering
>
>
>
> Help please
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problems-getting-solr-clustering-to-work-tp4032251.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
rithm
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> enable="${solr.clustering.enabled:true}"
> class="solr.SearchHandler">
>
> true
>
> default
>
> true
>
> subTitle
> anchorUrl
>
>fullSpeechString
>
>true
>
>false
>20
>
>
>
>
> clustering
>
>
>
> Help please
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problems-getting-solr-clustering-to-work-tp4032251.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problems-getting-solr-clustering-to-work-tp4032251.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
От кого: "Chandan Tamrakar"
Кому: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Дата: 4 сентября 2012, 12:30:56
Тема: Re: Solr Clustering
>
yes there is a solr component if you want to cluster solr documents , check
the following linkhttp://wiki.apache.org/solr/ClusteringComponent
Carrot2 might be good if yo
Hi, all.
I know there is carrot2 and mahout for clustering. I want to implement such
thing:
I fetch documents and want to group them into clusters when they are added to
index (i want to filter "similar" documents for example for 1 week). i need
these documents quickly, so i cant rely on some po
much more scalable and probably you need Hadoop for that
thanks
chandan
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Denis Kuzmenok wrote:
>
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Solr Clustering
> From: Denis Kuzmenok
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> CC:
>
>
Hi, all. I know there is carrot2 and mahout for clustering. I want to implement
such thing: I fetch documents and want to group them into clusters when they
are added to index (i want to filter "similar" documents for example for 1
week). i need these documents quickly, so i cant rely on some po
Original Message
Subject: Solr Clustering
From: Denis Kuzmenok
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
CC:
Hi, all.
I know there is carrot2 and mahout for clustering. I want to implement such
thing:
I fetch documents and want to group them into clusters when they are added to
ing is Elegant and Fun"
>],
> "docs":[
>"8335",
>"8337"
>]
> },
>{
> "labels":[
>"Other Topics"
>],
> "docs":[
>"8038",
>"7850",
>"7795",
>"7989",
>"7797"
>]
> {
>]*
>
>
> -
> Thanks & Regards
> Romi
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-use-solr-clustering-to-show-in-search-results-tp3125149p3125149.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> I am asking about the filter after clustering . Faceting is based on the
> single field so,if we need to filter we can search in related field . But
> in clustering it is created by multiple field then how can we create a
> filter for that.
>
> Example
>
> after clusetring you get the foll
Model(20)
System(15)
Other Topics(5)
if i will click on Model then i should get record associated with Model
Regards
Nilay Tiwari
-
Regards
Nilay Tiwari
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Clustering-For-Multiple-Pages-tp3085507p3128493.html
Sent from
etting is Elegant and Fun"
],
"docs":[
"8335",
"8337"
]
},
{
"labels":[
"Other Topics"
>
> and my second question is does clustering effect indexes.
>
No, it doesn't. Clustering is performed only on the search results produced
by Solr, it doesn't change anything in the index.
Cheers,
Staszek
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/what-is-solr-clustering-component-tp3121484p3124627.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> I just went through solr wiki page
> for clustering. But i am not getting what
> is the benefit of using clustering. Can anyone tell me what
> is actually
> clusering and what its use in indexing and searching.
> does it effect search results??
> Please reply
It is for search result clustering.
sage in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/what-is-solr-clustering-component-tp3121484p3121484.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I'm looking for cluster configuration(multiple Solr servers) instructions
for Solr.
Can you please post a link for Solr cluster configuration if you familiar
with such kind of document?
Thanks,
Shay
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-clust
rrently i storing docid and topic name in Map and get the ids by topic
> from Map and then pass into solr separating by OR condition
>
> Is there any other way to do this
>
>
>
> -
> Regards
> Nilay Tiwari
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lu
message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Clustering-For-Multiple-Pages-tp3085507p3094390.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks Alot . I was thinking i am not doing in correct way .
-
Regards
Nilay Tiwari
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Clustering-For-Multiple-Pages-tp3085507p3094379.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
@n3.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently, only the clustering of search results is implemented in Solr,
> clustering of the whole index is not possible out of the box. In other
> words, clustering applies only to the records you fetch during searching.
> For example, if you set rows=
Hi,
Currently, only the clustering of search results is implemented in Solr,
clustering of the whole index is not possible out of the box. In other
words, clustering applies only to the records you fetch during searching.
For example, if you set rows=10, only the 10 returned documents will be
cluster created
Model(20)
Test(10)
if i click on Model the i should get 20 records by filter so please give me
idea about this .
Please help me to resolve this problem
Regards
Nilay Tiwari
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Clustering-For
Mark Fletcher wrote:
Hi Koji,
Thank you so much for the reply.
I am not much familiar with the open source "trunk". So I downloaded
solr1.4 from the following location
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/lucene/solr/
On the browser I can see this err:-
---
Hi Koji,
Thank you so much for the reply.
I am not much familiar with the open source "trunk". So I downloaded solr1.4
from the following location
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/lucene/solr/
On the browser I can see this err:-
-
o
Mark Fletcher wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded the latest version of SOLR. From the contrib/clustering
directory ran *ant get-libraries*. It is not building!.
I've just tried ant get-libraries under contrib/clustering without
any problems. I used trunk. What was your error message?
Finally I manua
Hi,
I downloaded the latest version of SOLR. From the contrib/clustering
directory ran *ant get-libraries*. It is not building!.
Finally I manually downloaded colt, nni, pcj, simple xml and solr-common 1.3
jars and put them in the lib and restarted SOLR. It is giving me the
following err:-
*Erro
: Yes we are using Solr for a non-traditional search purpose and the
: performance is critical. However it sounds like that sharing the same index
: could slow down reading / writing to the index. And access synchronization
: is tricky as well.
no matter how you use Solr (HTTP or Embedded) only o
ave fashion just like
> normal web based Solr?
>
> Thanks,
>
> born2fish
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Embedded-Solr-Clustering-tp24891931p24900854.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:57 AM, born2fish wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> We have a web app that uses embedded solr for better performance.
I would advise against it. We use Solr on sites with millions of page views
a month on HTTP. With HTTP keep-alives, the overhead of an http request is
minimal
ure embedded solr
> instances to replicate indexes in a master / slave fashion just like normal
> web based Solr?
>
> Thanks,
>
> born2fish
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Embedded-Solr-Clustering-tp24891931p24891931.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
configure embedded solr
instances to replicate indexes in a master / slave fashion just like normal
web based Solr?
Thanks,
born2fish
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Embedded-Solr-Clustering-tp24891931p24891931.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
42 matches
Mail list logo
