Great. Thanks for the work on this patch!
Jim
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Cloud-A-B-Deployment-Issue-tp4302810p4303357.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
e this bug has
been fixed.
In the meantime, we can use our workaround to issue a simple delete command
that deletes a non-existent document.
Jim
--
View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.
nabble.com/Solr-Cloud-A-B-Deployment-Issue-tp4302810p4303210.html
Sent from the Solr - User ma
ediation, not prevention.
>
> My question is this: Why do the new nodes have to go into full replication
> recovery when they are already up to date? I just added the replica, so it
> shouldn't have to a new full replication again.
>
> Jim
>
>
>
>
> --
> View th
-existent document.
Jim
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Cloud-A-B-Deployment-Issue-tp4302810p4303210.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
is message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Cloud-A-B-Deployment-Issue-tp4302810p4302959.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
document is a hacky solution, however. It seems like new nodes that
were added via ADDREPLICA should know more about versions than they
currently do.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Cloud-A-B-Deployment-Issue-tp4302810p4302949.html
Sent from the Solr
ene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Cloud-A-B-Deployment-Issue-tp4302810.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
