Re: Unexpected Performance decrease when upgrading Solr 5.5.2 to 8.5.2

2020-09-16 Thread matthew sporleder
; > Your images won't appear on the mailing list. You'll need to post them > > elsewhere and link to them. > > > > On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 09:44, Keene Chen wrote: > > > > > Hi Solr users community, > > > > > > > > >

Re: Unexpected Performance decrease when upgrading Solr 5.5.2 to 8.5.2

2020-09-16 Thread Toke Eskildsen
Keene Chen wrote: > We have been doing some performance tests on Solr 5.5.2 > and Solr 8.5.2 as part of an upgrading process, and we have > noticed some reduced performance for certain types of > requests, particularly those that requests a large number of > rows, eg. 1. Solr

Re: Unexpected Performance decrease when upgrading Solr 5.5.2 to 8.5.2

2020-09-16 Thread Keene Chen
gt; Hello, > > Your images won't appear on the mailing list. You'll need to post them > elsewhere and link to them. > > On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 09:44, Keene Chen wrote: > > > Hi Solr users community, > > > > > > We have been doing some performance

Re: Unexpected Performance decrease when upgrading Solr 5.5.2 to 8.5.2

2020-09-16 Thread Colvin Cowie
Hello, Your images won't appear on the mailing list. You'll need to post them elsewhere and link to them. On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 09:44, Keene Chen wrote: > Hi Solr users community, > > > We have been doing some performance tests on Solr 5.5.2 and Solr 8.5.2 as > par

Unexpected Performance decrease when upgrading Solr 5.5.2 to 8.5.2

2020-09-15 Thread Keene Chen
Hi Solr users community, We have been doing some performance tests on Solr 5.5.2 and Solr 8.5.2 as part of an upgrading process, and we have noticed some reduced performance for certain types of requests, particularly those that requests a large number of rows, eg. 1. Would anyone have an

Re: Solr 5.5.2 - Custom Function Query update

2017-09-26 Thread Florian Le Vern
Hi Susheel and Emir, Thanks for your quick help. We are not using SolrCloud mode and the jar wasn't duplicated. My supposition about the jar not being updated initially came from a performance issue that was corrected. The effects were seen on our development environment and not on our testing

Re: Solr 5.5.2 - Custom Function Query update

2017-09-26 Thread Emir Arnautović
Hi Florian, I am guessing that you are running Solr in SolrCloud Mode. Please see https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/adding-custom-plugins-in-solrcloud-mode.html and let us know if this helps. Thanks,

Re: Solr 5.5.2 - Custom Function Query update

2017-09-25 Thread Susheel Kumar
ignore solr version... On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Susheel Kumar wrote: > Check if your jar is present at solr-6.0.0/server/solr//lib/ or do > a find under solr directory... > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Florian Le Vern > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I added a custom Function Query in a j

Re: Solr 5.5.2 - Custom Function Query update

2017-09-25 Thread Susheel Kumar
Check if your jar is present at solr-6.0.0/server/solr//lib/ or do a find under solr directory... On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Florian Le Vern wrote: > Hi, > > I added a custom Function Query in a jar library that is loaded from the > `solr/data/lib` folder (same level as the cores) with the

Solr 5.5.2 - Custom Function Query update

2017-09-25 Thread Florian Le Vern
Hi, I added a custom Function Query in a jar library that is loaded from the `solr/data/lib` folder (same level as the cores) with the solrconfig line: class="blah.blah.solr.search.function.MyFuncValueParser" /> I just updated this lib but after restarting Solr, it seems that it still uses th

Solr 5.5.2 - Custom Function Query update

2017-09-25 Thread Florian Le Vern
Hi, I added a custom Function Query in a jar library that is loaded from the `solr/data/lib` folder (same level as the cores) with the solrconfig line: I just updated this lib but after restarting Solr, it seems that it still uses the previous version. I also tried to delete the lib from the `s

Re: in-places update solr 5.5.2

2017-07-26 Thread elisabeth benoit
gt; Cassandra > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 2:30 AM, elisabeth benoit > wrote: > > Are in place updates available in solr 5.5.2, I find atomic updates in > the > > doc > > https://archive.apache.org/dist/lucene/solr/ref-guide/ > apache-solr-ref-guide-5.5.pdf, >

Re: in-places update solr 5.5.2

2017-07-26 Thread Cassandra Targett
dates was added for Solr 6.5, when SOLR-5944 was released. So, unfortunately, unless someone else has a better option for pre-6.5, I believe it was not possible in 5.5.2. Cassandra On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 2:30 AM, elisabeth benoit wrote: > Are in place updates available in solr 5.5.2, I fin

in-places update solr 5.5.2

2017-07-26 Thread elisabeth benoit
Are in place updates available in solr 5.5.2, I find atomic updates in the doc https://archive.apache.org/dist/lucene/solr/ref-guide/apache-solr-ref-guide-5.5.pdf, which redirects me to the page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Updating+Parts+of+Documents#UpdatingPartsofDocuments

solr 5.5.2 bug in edismax pf2 when boosting term

2017-05-18 Thread elisabeth benoit
Hello, I am using solr 5.5.2. I am trying to give a lower score to frequent words in query. The only way I've found so far is to do like q=avenue^0.1 de champaubert village suisse 75015 paris where avenue is a frequent word. The problem is I'm using edismax, and when I add ^0.1 to

solr 5.5.2 using omitNorms=False on multivalued fields

2016-10-18 Thread elisabeth benoit
= False is not working. Does anyone know how to achieve this with a multivalued field on solr 5.5.2? Best regards, Elisabeth

Re: migration to solr 5.5.2 highlight on ngrams not working

2016-09-22 Thread elisabeth benoit
and as was said in previous post, we can clearly see in analysis output that end values for edgengrams are good for solr 4.10.1 and not good for solr 5.5.2 solr 5.5.2 text raw_bytes start end positionLength type position p [70] 0 5 1 word 1 pa [70 61] 0 5 1 word 1 par [70 61 72] 0 5 1 word 1

migration to solr 5.5.2 highlight on ngrams not working

2016-09-22 Thread elisabeth benoit
Hello After migrating from solr 4.10.1 to solr 5.5.2, we dont have the same behaviour with highlighting on edge ngrams fields. We're using it for an autocomplete component. With Solr 4.10.1, if request is sol, highlighting on solr is sol<\em>r with solr 5.5.2, we have solr<\em&g

Re: solr 5.5.2 dump threads - threads blocked in org.eclipse.jetty.util.BlockingArrayQueue

2016-09-08 Thread elisabeth benoit
Well, we rekicked the machine with puppet, restarted solr and now it seems ok. dont know what happened. 2016-09-08 11:38 GMT+02:00 elisabeth benoit : > > Hello, > > > We are perf testing solr 5.5.2 (with a limit test, i.e. sending as much > queries/sec as possible) and we see

solr 5.5.2 dump threads - threads blocked in org.eclipse.jetty.util.BlockingArrayQueue

2016-09-08 Thread elisabeth benoit
Hello, We are perf testing solr 5.5.2 (with a limit test, i.e. sending as much queries/sec as possible) and we see the cpu never goes over 20%, and threads are blocked in org.eclipse.jetty.util.BlockingArrayQueue, as we can see in solr admin interface thread dumps qtp706277948-757 (757

threads blocked in LRUcache.get() in solr 5.5.2

2016-08-31 Thread elisabeth benoit
Hello, We are migrating from solr 4.10.1 to solr 5.5.2. We don't use solr cloud. We installed the service with installation script and kept the default configuration, except for a few settings about logs and the gc config (the same used with solr 4.10.1). We tested today the performanc

Re: Solr 5.5.2 mm parameter not working the same

2016-07-27 Thread elisabeth benoit
oh sorry wrote too fast. had to change the defaultOperator to OR. Elisabeth 2016-07-27 10:11 GMT+02:00 elisabeth benoit : > > Hello, > > We are migrating from solr 4.10.1 to solr 5.5.2, and it seems that the mm > parameter is not working the same anymore. > > In fact, as so

Solr 5.5.2 mm parameter not working the same

2016-07-27 Thread elisabeth benoit
Hello, We are migrating from solr 4.10.1 to solr 5.5.2, and it seems that the mm parameter is not working the same anymore. In fact, as soon as there is a word not in the index in the query, no matter what mm value I send, I get no answer as if my query is a pure AND query. Does anyone have a

Re: solr 5.5.2 loadOnStartUp does not work

2016-07-26 Thread elisabeth benoit
Hello, Thanks for your answer. Yes, it seems a little tricky to me. Best regards, Elisabeth 2016-07-25 18:06 GMT+02:00 Erick Erickson : > "Load" is a little tricky here, it means "load the core and open a > searcher. > The core _descriptor_ which is the internal structure of > core.properties

Re: solr 5.5.2 loadOnStartUp does not work

2016-07-25 Thread Erick Erickson
"Load" is a little tricky here, it means "load the core and open a searcher. The core _descriptor_ which is the internal structure of core.properties (plus some other info) _is_ loaded and is what's used to show the list of available cores. Else how would you even know the core existed? It's not u

solr 5.5.2 loadOnStartUp does not work

2016-07-25 Thread elisabeth benoit
Hello, I have a core.properties with content name=indexer loadOnStartup=false but the core is loaded on start up (it appears on the admin interface). I thougth the core would be unloaded on startup. did I miss something? best regards, elisabeth

Re: Solr "replicateAfter optimize" is specified, but replication starts also on commits and master startup (tested on solr 5.5.2)

2016-07-22 Thread Erick Erickson
mailto:apa...@elyograg.org] > Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 3:37 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Solr "replicateAfter optimize" is specified, but replication > starts also on commits and master startup (tested on solr 5.5.2) > > On 7/22/2016 4:02 AM, Alessandro Bon

RE: Solr "replicateAfter optimize" is specified, but replication starts also on commits and master startup (tested on solr 5.5.2)

2016-07-22 Thread Alessandro Bon
From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:apa...@elyograg.org] Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 3:37 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr "replicateAfter optimize" is specified, but replication starts also on commits and master startup (tested on solr 5.5.2) On 7/22/2016 4:02 AM, Alessandro Bon w

Re: Solr "replicateAfter optimize" is specified, but replication starts also on commits and master startup (tested on solr 5.5.2)

2016-07-22 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 7/22/2016 4:02 AM, Alessandro Bon wrote: > Issue: Full index replicas occur sometimes on master startup and after > commits, despite only the optimize > directive is specified. In the case of replica on commit, it occurs > only for sufficiently big commits. Replica correctly starts again at > th

Solr "replicateAfter optimize" is specified, but replication starts also on commits and master startup (tested on solr 5.5.2)

2016-07-22 Thread Alessandro Bon
Hi everyone, I am experiencing a replication issue on a master/slave configuration, Issue: Full index replicas occur sometimes on master startup and after commits, despite only the optimize directive is specified. In the case of replica on commit, it occurs only for sufficiently big commits. Re

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 5.5.2 released

2016-06-25 Thread Steve Rowe
25 June 2016, Apache Solr™ 5.5.2 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 5.5.2 Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted

Re: Solr 5.5.2

2016-05-26 Thread Erick Erickson
Note that <3> is actually not hard at all, the "ant package" target does it all for you. You do need to install ant and a Java JDK, but the rest is pretty automatic, just apply the patch and execute the above target. Details are here in case you get desperate ;)... https://wiki.apache.org/solr/Ho

Re: Solr 5.5.2

2016-05-26 Thread Nick Vasilyev
Thanks Erik, option 4 is my favorite so far :) On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > There is no plan to release 5.5.2, development has moved to trunk and > 6.x. Also, while there > is a patch for that JIRA it hasn't been committed even in trunk/6.0. > > So I think your choice

Re: Solr 5.5.2

2016-05-26 Thread Erick Erickson
There is no plan to release 5.5.2, development has moved to trunk and 6.x. Also, while there is a patch for that JIRA it hasn't been committed even in trunk/6.0. So I think your choices are: 1> find a work-around 2> see about moving to Solr 6.0.1 (in release process now), assuming that it solv

Solr 5.5.2

2016-05-26 Thread Nick Vasilyev
Is there an anticipated release date for 5.5.2? I know 5.5.1 was just released a while ago and although it fixes the faceting performance (SOLR-8096), distributed grouping is broken (SOLR-8940). I just need a solid 5.x release that is stable and with all core functionality working. Thanks