That was really clear; I just had another read through of the documentation
with that explanation in mind and I can see I went off the rails.
Sorry for any confusion on my part, and thanks for the details.
Ta,
Greg
On 8 March 2014 08:36, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> : Thank-you, that all sounds
: Thank-you, that all sounds great. My assumption about documents being
: missed was something like this:
...
: In that situation D would always be missed, whether the cursorMark 'C or
: greater' or 'greater than B' (I'm not sure which it is in practice), simply
: because the cursorMark is
Thank-you, that all sounds great. My assumption about documents being
missed was something like this:
A,B,C,D
where they are sorted by timestamp first and ID second. Say the first
'page' of results is 'A,B', and before the second page is requested both
documents B + C receive update events and th
