Thanks for clarifying Yonik.
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
>> "Unfortunately, Apache Solr still uses this horrible code in a lot of
>> places, leaving us with a major piece of work undone. Major parts of
>> Solr’s fac
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> "Unfortunately, Apache Solr still uses this horrible code in a lot of
> places, leaving us with a major piece of work undone. Major parts of
> Solr’s facetting and filter caching need to be rewritten to work per
> atomic segment! For those im
I just got done reading
http://www.searchworkings.org/blog/-/blogs/uwe-says%3A-is-your-reader-atomic
and was specifically interested in the following line
"Unfortunately, Apache Solr still uses this horrible code in a lot of
places, leaving us with a major piece of work undone. Major parts of
Solr
