On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:21 AM, elisabeth benoit
wrote:
> ok, thanks.
>
> I think it would be a nice improvment to consider inversion as distance =
> 1, since it's a so common mistake. The distance = 2 makes it difficult to
> correct transpositions on small words (for instance, the DirectSpellChe
ok, thanks.
I think it would be a nice improvment to consider inversion as distance =
1, since it's a so common mistake. The distance = 2 makes it difficult to
correct transpositions on small words (for instance, the DirectSpellChecker
couldn't make the right suggestion for "joile" given for 'joli
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 8:07 AM, elisabeth benoit
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to know if the Levensthein distance algorithm used by Solr 4.0
> DirectSpellChecker (working quite well I must say) is considering an
> inversion as distance = 1 or distance = 2?
>
> For instance, if I write Monteruil a
Hello,
I'd like to know if the Levensthein distance algorithm used by Solr 4.0
DirectSpellChecker (working quite well I must say) is considering an
inversion as distance = 1 or distance = 2?
For instance, if I write Monteruil and I meant Montreuil, is the distance 1
or 2?
Thanks,
Elisabeth
