Thanks guyz, it really helps. I will now go ahead with my original plan of
using 4.0 for this project, I should be able to update you guyz soon on
this.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-3-6-2-or-4-0-tp4030527p4030842.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
I agree with the 'more mature' analysis, but surely you can use 4.0 in a
3.x style without greater difficulty, no?
Upayavira
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013, at 07:35 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you don't need to shard your index and don't need NRT search Solr 3.x
> is
> much simpler to operate
Hi,
If you don't need to shard your index and don't need NRT search Solr 3.x is
much simpler to operate and is more mature.
Otis
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Jan 4, 2013 7:08 AM, "Dikchant Sahi" wrote:
> As someone in the forum correctly said, if all Solr releases were
>
3.6.2 is a maintenance release with bug fixes for existing 3.x users for
whom an upgrade to 4.0 is too big a leap at present. 4.0 is the release
that will see active development from here on in. If you ware starting
with a new project, 4.0 seems a reasonable place to start. I'd expect
4.1 to be out
As someone in the forum correctly said, if all Solr releases were
evolutionary Solr 4.0 is revolutionary. It has lots of improvement over the
previous releases like NoSql features, atomic updates, cloud features and
lot more.
Solr 4.0 would be the right migration I believe.
Can someone in the for
We are starting a new e-com application from this month onwards, for which I
am trying to identify the right SOLR release. We were using 3.4 in our
previous project, bu I have read in multiple blogs and forums about the
improvements that SOLR 4 has in terms of efficient memory management, less
OOMs
