> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 15:31 PM, Adam Estrada
>
> I wanted to know how large field's size affects performance.
If you use replication then it's a huge impact on performance as the data gets
sent over the network. It's also a memory hog so there's less memory and more
garbage collection. Ind
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 15:31 PM, Adam Estrada wrote:
> Well...by default there is a pretty decent schema that you can use as a
> template in the example project that builds with Solr. Tika is the library
> that does the actual content extraction so it would be a good idea to try
> the example pro
Ezequiel,
Am 06.04.2011 20:38, schrieb Ezequiel Calderara:
Anyone knows any storage for images that performs well, other than FS ?
you may have a look on http://www.danga.com/mogilefs/ ? :)
Regards
Stefan
Well...by default there is a pretty decent schema that you can use as a
template in the example project that builds with Solr. Tika is the library
that does the actual content extraction so it would be a good idea to try
the example project out first.
Adam
2011/4/6 Ezequiel Calderara
> Another
On 4/6/2011 2:39 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
Ha, there's a binary field type?!
I've stored binary data in an ordinary "String" field type, and it's
worked. But there were some headaches to get it to work, might have
been smoother if I had realized there was actually a binary field type.
How, you
> Hi, your answers were really helpfull
>
> I was thinking in putting the base64 encoded file into a string field. But
> was a little worried about solr trying to stem it or vectorize or those
> stuff.
String field types are not analyzed. So it doesn't brutalize your data. Better
use BinaryFiel
> Ha, there's a binary field type?!
>
> I've stored binary data in an ordinary "String" field type, and it's
> worked. But there were some headaches to get it to work, might have
> been smoother if I had realized there was actually a binary field type.
How, you can't just embed control characte
Hi, your answers were really helpfull
I was thinking in putting the base64 encoded file into a string field. But
was a little worried about solr trying to stem it or vectorize or those
stuff.
Seen in the example of the schema.xml:
Anyone knows any storage for images that performs well,
Ha, there's a binary field type?!
I've stored binary data in an ordinary "String" field type, and it's
worked. But there were some headaches to get it to work, might have
been smoother if I had realized there was actually a binary field type.
But wait I'm talking about Solr 'stored field', n
I put binary data in an ordinary Solr stored field, don't need any
special schema.
I have run into trouble making sure the data is not corrupted on the way
in during indexing, depending on exactly what form of communication is
being used to index (SolrJ, SolrJ with EmbeddedSolr, DIH, etc.), as
You can store binary data using a binary field type -- then you need
to send the data base64 encoded.
I would strongly recommend against storing large binary files in solr
-- unless you really don't care about performance -- the file system
is a good option that springs to mind.
ryan
2011/4/6
Another question that maybe is easier to answer, how can i store binary
data? Any example schema?
2011/4/6 Ezequiel Calderara
> Hello everyone, i need to know if some has used solr for indexing and
> storing images (upt to 16MB) or binary docs.
>
> How does solr behaves with this type of docs? H
Hello everyone, i need to know if some has used solr for indexing and
storing images (upt to 16MB) or binary docs.
How does solr behaves with this type of docs? How affects performance?
Thanks Everyone
--
__
Ezequiel.
Http://www.ironicnet.com
13 matches
Mail list logo
