)
Regards,
Jens
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Daniele Salvatico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 28. Januar 2008 11:35
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: SnowballPorterFilterFactory and protected words
hossman wrote:
>
>
> I'm not sure i understand w
uld be to add the latter in
the stopwords.txt?
I think i still have to tune and play with all the dismax paramethers and
set as much strict as possible the "mm" as you said. I'm trying to have a
good balancing of boosting options
Anyway in most of the cases Solr works very well.
I'll let u know!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/SnowballPorterFilterFactory-and-protected-words-tp15042758p15132455.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: i'm using Solr in a e-commerce site, and i wanted to use protected words
: also to reduce recall for certain queries.
I'm not sure i understand what you mwan. Why would protected words (in
regards to the stemmer) reduce recall ? ... i guess it depends on the
words you are protecting right ..
class, then add a config option for it in Solr.
>
> (if anyone is so inclined)
>
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/SnowballPorterFilterFactory-and-protected-words-tp15042758p15061335.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: I have a question about using the "protected=" attribute with
: SnowballPorterFilterFactory filter.
SnowballPorterFilterFactory doesn't (and has never) supported a protwords
option ... that feature is unique to the EnglishPorterFilterFactory.
this is probably just due to how they came about
Is it possible to use the protected words with SnowballPorterFilterFactory?
Seems like it's working fine only with EnglishPorterFilterFactory.
Thanks
Daniele
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/SnowballPorterFilterFa
