There are about 30 Million Docs and the index size is 75 GB. Using a full
timestamp value when querying and not using NOW. The fq queries covers
almost all the docs(20+ million) in the index.
Thanks
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Oops, fat fingers.
>
> see:
> searchhu
Oops, fat fingers.
see:
searchhub.org/2012/02/23/date-math-now-and-filter-queries/
If you're not re-using the _same_ filter query, you'll be better
off using fq={!cache=false}range_query
Best,
Erick
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> That does seem long, but you haven't p
That does seem long, but you haven't provided many details
about the fields. Are there 100 docs in your index? 100M docs? 500M docs?
Are you using NOW in appropriately? See:
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Jay Potharaju wrote:
> Hi,
> I am running filter query(range query) on date fields(high c
Hi,
I am running filter query(range query) on date fields(high cardinality) and
the performance is really bad ...it takes about 2-5 seconds for it to come
back with response. I am rebuilding the index to have docvalues & tdates
instead of "date" field. But not sure if that will alleviate the proble
