Re: Simple query

Thanks. I just copied the config file under solr/solr-8.6.0/server/solr/configsets/_default and made minor changes. Tried the console - I think SKMF is doing it. Regards, Jayadevan On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 5:45 PM Dominique Bejean wrote: > Hi, > > We need to know how is analyzed your catch_all

Re: Simple query

Hi, We need to know how is analyzed your catch_all field at index and search time. I think you are using a stemming filter and "apache" is stemmed as "apach". So "apache" and "apach" match the document and not "apac". You can use the console in order to see how terms are removed or transformed by

Simple query

Hi all, I am learning the basics of Solr querying and am not able to figure out something. The first query which searches for 'apac' fetches no documents. The second one which searches for 'apach' , i.e. add h - one more character, fetches a document. curl -X GET " http://localhost:8983/solr/searc

Re: does the payload_check query parser have support for simple query parser operators?

Ok, thanks. Do you know if there are any plans to support special syntax in the future? On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 5:04 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote: > No it doesn’t. The payload parsers currently just simple tokenize with > no special syntax supported. > > Erik > > > On Nov 30, 2017, at 02:41, John

Re: does the payload_check query parser have support for simple query parser operators?

No it doesn’t. The payload parsers currently just simple tokenize with no special syntax supported. Erik > On Nov 30, 2017, at 02:41, John Anonymous wrote: > > I would like to use wildcards and fuzzy search with the payload_check query > parser. Are these supported? > > {!payload_check f

does the payload_check query parser have support for simple query parser operators?

I would like to use wildcards and fuzzy search with the payload_check query parser. Are these supported? {!payload_check f=text payloads='NOUN'}apple~1 {!payload_check f=text payloads='NOUN'}app* Thanks

Re: solr simple query searh

h query= i phone > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-simple-query-searh-tp4262402.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

solr simple query searh

i phone -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-simple-query-searh-tp4262402.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Streaming API running a simple query

Hi All, I have written a blog to cover this nested merge expressions, see http://knackforge.com/blog/selvam/solr-streaming-expressions for more details. Thanks. On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Selvam wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks, that seems to be working! > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Joel B

Re: Streaming API running a simple query

Hi, Thanks, that seems to be working! On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote: > This sounds doable using nested merge functions like this: > > merge(search(...), >merge(search(...), search(),...), ...) > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > > On Sat, Aug

Re: Streaming API running a simple query

This sounds doable using nested merge functions like this: merge(search(...), merge(search(...), search(),...), ...) Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Selvam wrote: > Hi, > > I needed to run a multiple subqueries each with its own limit of

Re: Streaming API running a simple query

Hi, I needed to run a multiple subqueries each with its own limit of rows. For eg: to get 30 users from country India with age greater than 30 and 50 users from England who are all male. Thanks again. On 08-Aug-2015 5:30 pm, "Joel Bernstein" wrote: > Can you describe your use case? > > Joel Be

Re: Streaming API running a simple query

Can you describe your use case? Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Selvam wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks, good to know, in fact my requirement needs to merge multiple > expressions, while current streaming expressions supports only two > expression. Do you thi

Re: Streaming API running a simple query

Hi, Thanks, good to know, in fact my requirement needs to merge multiple expressions, while current streaming expressions supports only two expression. Do you think we can expect that in future versions? On 07-Aug-2015 6:46 pm, "Joel Bernstein" wrote: > Hi, > > There is a new error handling fram

Re: Streaming API running a simple query

Hi, There is a new error handling framework in trunk (SOLR-7441) for the Streaming API, Streaming Expressions. So if you're purely in testing mode, it will be much easier to work in trunk then Solr 5.2. If you run into errors in trunk that are still confusing please continue to report them so we

Re: Streaming API running a simple query

Hi, Sorry, it is working now. curl --data-urlencode 'stream=search(gettingstarted,q="*:*",fl="id",sort="id asc")' http://localhost:8983/solr/gettingstarted/stream I missed *'asc'* in sort :) Thanks for the help Shawn Heisey. On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Selvam wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for

Re: Streaming API running a simple query

Hi, Thanks for your update, yes, I was missing the cloud mode, I am new to the world of Solr cloud. Now I have enabled a single node (with two shards & replicas) that runs on 8983 port along with zookeeper running on 9983 port. When I run, curl --data-urlencode 'stream=search(gettingstarted,q="*

Re: Streaming API running a simple query

On 8/7/2015 1:37 AM, Selvam wrote: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Streaming+Expressions > > I tried this from my linux terminal, > 1) curl --data-urlencode > 'stream=search(gettingstarted,q="*:*",fl="id",sort="id")' > http://localhost:8983/solr/gettingstarted/stream > > Thre

Streaming API running a simple query

Hi All, I am trying to use Streaming API in Solr 5.2. For eg as per https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Streaming+Expressions I tried this from my linux terminal, 1) curl --data-urlencode 'stream=search(gettingstarted,q="*:*",fl="id",sort="id")' http://localhost:8983/solr/gettings

Re: SOLR JOINS not working and not returning any data for simple query

Really, how can anyone help with this little information? Please read: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists Best, Erick On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:03 PM, William Bell wrote: > Send the queries. > > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:32 PM, EXTERNAL Taminidi Ravi (ETI, > Automotive-Service-Solut

Re: SOLR JOINS not working and not returning any data for simple query

Send the queries. On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:32 PM, EXTERNAL Taminidi Ravi (ETI, Automotive-Service-Solutions) wrote: > Hi All, > > I am facing a strange behavior with the Solr Server. All my joins are not > working suddenly after a restart. Individual collections are returning the > response but

SOLR JOINS not working and not returning any data for simple query

Hi All, I am facing a strange behavior with the Solr Server. All my joins are not working suddenly after a restart. Individual collections are returning the response but when I join the collection , I am getting zero documents. Let me know if anyone have same type of issues.

Re: Solr performance issues for simple query - q=*:* with start and rows

gt; > >> >>> Hi, > >> >>> > >> >>> How many shards do you have? This is a known issue with deep paging > >> with > >> >>> multi shard, see https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/SOLR-1726< > >> https://iss

Re: Solr performance issues for simple query - q=*:* with start and rows

t;> How many shards do you have? This is a known issue with deep paging >> with >> >>> multi shard, see https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/SOLR-1726< >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1726> >> >>> >> >>> You may be

Re: Solr performance issues for simple query - q=*:* with start and rows

browse/SOLR-1726> > >>> > >>> You may be more successful in going to each shard, one at a time (with > >>> &distrib=false) to avoid this issue. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > >>>

Re: Solr performance issues for simple query - q=*:* with start and rows

th >>> &distrib=false) to avoid this issue. >>> >>> -- >>> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >>> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >>> Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com >>> >>> 29. apr. 2013 kl. 09:17 skrev Abhishek Sano

Re: Solr performance issues for simple query - q=*:* with start and rows

u may be more successful in going to each shard, one at a time (with >> &distrib=false) to avoid this issue. >> >> -- >> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >> Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com >> >> 29.

Re: Solr performance issues for simple query - q=*:* with start and rows

with &distrib=false) to avoid this issue. -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com 29. apr. 2013 kl. 09:17 skrev Abhishek Sanoujam : We have a solr core with about 115 million documents. We are trying to migrate da

Re: Solr performance issues for simple query - q=*:* with start and rows

olrtraining.com > > 29. apr. 2013 kl. 09:17 skrev Abhishek Sanoujam : > > > We have a solr core with about 115 million documents. We are trying to > migrate data and running a simple query with *:* query and with start and > rows param. > > The performance is becomin

Re: Solr performance issues for simple query - q=*:* with start and rows

tect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com 29. apr. 2013 kl. 09:17 skrev Abhishek Sanoujam : > We have a solr core with about 115 million documents. We are trying to > migrate data and running a simple query with *:* query and with start and > rows

Solr performance issues for simple query - q=*:* with start and rows

We have a solr core with about 115 million documents. We are trying to migrate data and running a simple query with *:* query and with start and rows param. The performance is becoming too slow in solr, its taking almost 2 mins to get 4000 rows and migration is being just too slow. Logs snippet

Re: simple query help

: András Bártházi Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 6:50 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: simple query help Hi, You should use parantheses, have you tried that? q=(skcode:2021051 and flength:368.0) or (skcode:2021049 and ent_no:1040970907) http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/solr-and

Re: simple query help

Kirk Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 8:23 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: simple query help Hi If I understand the terms correctly, the search-handler was configured to use "edismax". The start of the configuration in the solrconfig.xml looks like this: edismax

RE: simple query help

> But whether or not it was simply the act of restarting - I'm > not sure. (I had also found out that "AND " and "OR" should > be written in uppercase, but this made no difference until > after I had restarted). By the way, there is a control parameter for this. "lowercaseOperators A Boolean

Re: simple query help

around is to place a space between the left parenthesis and the field name. See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3377 -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Peter Kirk Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 7:04 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: simple query help

RE: simple query help

ter -Original Message- From: Ahmet Arslan [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com] Sent: 15. maj 2012 13:25 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: simple query help > It doesn't make a difference. But now I'm thinking there's something > completely odd - and I wonder if it'

Re: simple query help

rarian.billdueber.com/solr-and-boolean-operators/ > > Bye, >  Andras > > 2012/5/15 Peter Kirk > >> Hi >> >> Can someone please give me some help with a simple query. >> >> If I search >> q=skcode:2021051 and flength:368.0 >> >

RE: simple query help

> It doesn't make a difference. But now I'm thinking there's > something completely odd - and I wonder if it's necessary to > use a special search-handler to achieve what  I want. > > For example, if I execute > q=(skcode:2021051 AND flength:368.0) > > I get no results. If I omit the parentheses

RE: simple query help

er@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: simple query help Hi, You should use parantheses, have you tried that? q=(skcode:2021051 and flength:368.0) or (skcode:2021049 and ent_no:1040970907) http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/solr-and-boolean-operators/ Bye, Andras 2012/5/15 Peter Kirk > Hi >

Re: simple query help

Hi, You should use parantheses, have you tried that? q=(skcode:2021051 and flength:368.0) or (skcode:2021049 and ent_no:1040970907) http://robotlibrarian.billdueber.com/solr-and-boolean-operators/ Bye, Andras 2012/5/15 Peter Kirk > Hi > > Can someone please give me some help with

simple query help

Hi Can someone please give me some help with a simple query. If I search q=skcode:2021051 and flength:368.0 I get 1 document returned (doc A) If I search q=skcode:2021049 and ent_no:1040970907 I get 1 document returned (doc B) But if I search q=skcode:2021051 and flength:368.0 or skcode

Re: A simple query?

.nabble.com/A-simple-query-tp3395465p3416863.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: A simple query?

: This may seem to be an easy one but I have been struggling to get it : working. To simplify things, let's say I have a field that can contain any : combination of the 26 alphabetic letters, space delimited: I suspect you may have "over simplified" your problem in a way that may make some specif

Re: A simple query?

rote: > From: alexw > Subject: Re: A simple query? > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Date: Wednesday, October 5, 2011, 3:15 PM > Thanks but, unfortunately that will > not solve the problem since it will bring > back both the first and second doc. Besides, the query > terms is:

Re: A simple query?

Thanks but, unfortunately that will not solve the problem since it will bring back both the first and second doc. Besides, the query terms is: a b y z, not just: a b -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/A-simple-query-tp3395465p3396297.html Sent from the Solr

Re: A simple query?

iew this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/A-simple-query-tp3395465p3395735.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

A simple query?

vance! -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/A-simple-query-tp3395465p3395465.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Querying Dynamic Fields.. simple query not working

SOLR-1129 was for a different use case, Ninad. I have created an issue for this enhancement - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1357 Cheers Avlesh On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Ninad Raut wrote: > Hi, > SOLR-1129 seems to have > been

Re: Querying Dynamic Fields.. simple query not working

Hi, SOLR-1129 seems to have been solved . Can I apply the patch? 2009/8/11 Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Avlesh Singh wrote: > > Ah! I guessed you were using it this way. > > > > I would need to reconfirm this, but

Re: Querying Dynamic Fields.. simple query not working

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Avlesh Singh wrote: > Ah! I guessed you were using it this way. > > I would need to reconfirm this, but there seems to be an inconsistency in > fetching data versus adding data via SolrJ w.r.t dynamic fields. > SOLR-1129

Re: Querying Dynamic Fields.. simple query not working

Well there are multiple ways to do it. Instead of using your own class (with annotated fields), you can directly use an instance of SolrInputDocument for each document and call a SolrServer.add(SolrInputDocument doc). For each SolrInputDocument, you can use the addField(String name, Object value) t

Re: Querying Dynamic Fields.. simple query not working

Hi Avlesh, Can you tell me a work around to this problem?? Till you have this resolved.:) Regards, Ninad. On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Avlesh Singh wrote: > Ah! I guessed you were using it this way. > > I would need to reconfirm this, but there seems to be an inconsistency in > fetching dat

Re: Querying Dynamic Fields.. simple query not working

Ah! I guessed you were using it this way. I would need to reconfirm this, but there seems to be an inconsistency in fetching data versus adding data via SolrJ w.r.t dynamic fields. SOLR-1129is essentially about binding the response into a bean with

Re: Querying Dynamic Fields.. simple query not working

This is the POJO field mapping: @Field("*_ne") Map ne = new HashMap(); this is how I set the value: Map namedEntity = new HashMap(); namedEntity.put("Germinait", "0.7"); ithursDocument.setNe(namedEntity); server.addBean(ithursDocument); server.commit(); The schema had this dynamic field:

Re: Querying Dynamic Fields.. simple query not working

Weird that you get to see a field name like "ne_.*" in the response. I am afraid that you might be using the field in an incorrect way. Can you share the field definition please? And a peek into how are you populating these fields? Cheers Avlesh On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Ninad Raut wrote:

Querying Dynamic Fields.. simple query not working

Hi, when I do a *:* query I can see the dynamic field as show below: {Germinait=0.7} but when I try to query for the same like ne_Germinait:0.7 I get zero records. All the other field which are not dynamic can be easily queried. Can some one please tell me how to query for dynamic fields? Thanks. N

Re: simple query

On 4/25/07, Gal Nitzan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: When I search Q=title:"dog%20da*" ... Probably has to do with the way your "title" field is analyzed. The best way to debug such problems is with the analyzer admin tool: http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/analysis.jsp - that page will show

simple query

Hi, I'm new to Solr... I'm trying to create an Auto Complete combo which is based on results from Solr but I ran into a few problems which are related to the query. The Schema field is: What I try to do: Q=title:"d*" # get all title which has the letter d followed by anything Q=title:"do*"