: now I have simple Lucene Indexes that basically re-created once daily and
: that simply isn't doing the job for about 30% of my content.
do you mean it takes to long to index all your content so you can only do
part of it, or do you mean it's not indexing some of your conent "well" ?
: For in
m Archambault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 4:15:42 PM
Subject: Re: Simple Faceted Searching out of the box
Okay. We are all on the same page. I just don't express myself as well in
"programming speak" yet.
I'm going
Amen Hoss. I appreciated you explaining in terms of what I can understand,
"jobs." Makes it easier for me to learn.
What you are saying is right-on with what I'm trying to understand. Right
now I have simple Lucene Indexes that basically re-created once daily and
that simply isn't doing the job
: I've been talking with other papers about Solr and I think what bothers many
: is that there a is a deposit of information in a structured database here
: [named A], then we have another set of basically the same data over here
: [named B] and they don't understand why they have to manage to dif
Regarding XML databases, there is an excellent open-source XML database 'eXist'
which currently uses indexes to speed up both structure-based and content-based
retrieval via XQuery; there are plans on their development roadmap to replace
parts of the indexing mechanism, particularly fulltext ana
Okay. We are all on the same page. I just don't express myself as well in
"programming speak" yet.
I'm going to read up on Otis' "Lucene in Action" tonight. I'd swear he had
an example of how to inject records into a lucene index using java and sql.
Maybe I'm wrong though.
On 9/22/06, Walter U
I think you will find that this architecture is quite common. What
commercial packages
provide (remember you are getting this for free!) are the tools for
managing the dynamic
export of data out of your database into the full-text search engine.
Solr provides a very easy way to do this, but ye
Sorry, I was not being exact with "store". Lucene has separate
control over whether the value of a field is stored and whether
it is indexed. The term "nurse" might be searchable, but the
only value that is stored in the index for retrieval is the
database key for each matching job.
It seems like
On 9/22/06, Tim Archambault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been talking with other papers about Solr and I think what bothers many
is that there a is a deposit of information in a structured database here
[named A], then we have another set of basically the same data over here
[named B] and they
I'm really confused. I don't mean "store" the data figuratively as in a
lucene/solr command. Storing an ID number in a solr index isn't going to
help a user find "nurse". I think part of this is that some people feel that
databases like MSSQL, MYSQL should be able to provide quality search
experie
On 9/22/06 12:25 PM, "Tim Archambault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> A recruitment (jobs) customer goes onto our website and posts an online job
> posting to our newspaper website. Upon insert into the database, I need to
> generate an xml file to be sent to SOLR to ADD as a record to the search
>
Okay, I'll use an example.
A recruitment (jobs) customer goes onto our website and posts an online job
posting to our newspaper website. Upon insert into the database, I need to
generate an xml file to be sent to SOLR to ADD as a record to the search
engine. Same goes for an edit, my database u
On Sep 22, 2006, at 2:45 PM, Tim Archambault wrote:
I believe there's a way to access MSSQL, MySQL etc. directly with
Lucene,
but not sure how to do this with SOLR.
Nope. Lucene is a pure search engine, with no hooks to databases, or
document parsers, etc. Lots of folks have built these
Obvious datasources: MSSQL, MySQL, etc. I'm under the impression that I have
to send an XML request to SOLR for every add, update, delete, etc. in my
database.
I believe there's a way to access MSSQL, MySQL etc. directly with Lucene,
but not sure how to do this with SOLR.
Thanks for all your fee
On 9/22/06, Tim Archambault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a couple of questions from some online newspaper folks who are
interested in Solr and are trying to understand how and why it came to be. I
think inherent in these questions is the underlying theme I hear all the
time and that is "Solr
I have a couple of questions from some online newspaper folks who are
interested in Solr and are trying to understand how and why it came to be. I
think inherent in these questions is the underlying theme I hear all the
time and that is "Solr is not a content management system. It's a search
engin
On Sep 12, 2006, at 4:15 AM, Kevin Lewandowski wrote:
Is it possible that the facets can be based on the contents of an
entire field instead of the terms?
For this, you could use a to copy one field into another
field where one is tokenized and the other is not. And then return
facets fo
Is it possible that the facets can be based on the contents of an
entire field instead of the terms?
For example say I have a document with this field:
Hip Hop
A facet query on the genre field returns:
1
1
but I'd like it to return:
1
thanks,
Kevin
: > > What is "faceted browsing"? Maybe an example of a site interface
Whoops! ... sorry about that, i tend to get ahead of my self.
The examples Erik pointed out are very representative, but there are more
subtle ways faceted searching can come into play -- for example, if you
look at these two
For those using PHP to interface with can you explain to me how your PHP
code interacts with Solr? Does PHP create a query_string manually and post
an URL like this:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=vertical%3Ajobs+accounting&version=2.1&start=0&rows=10&fl=&qt=standard&stylesheet=&indent=on&exp
On Sep 9, 2006, at 9:09 AM, Tim Archambault wrote:
I need to understand this then. Thanks. I want to use Solr for our
newspaper
website and this would be a great way to break out content. Kind of
greys
the lines between what is search and what is browsing categories,
which is a
great thing
Good. Thk u,Hoss.
2006/9/9, Tim Archambault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hoss,
What is "faceted browsing"? Maybe an example of a site interface that is
using it would be good. Dumb question, I know.
On 9/8/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hey everybody, I just wanted to officiall
I need to understand this then. Thanks. I want to use Solr for our newspaper
website and this would be a great way to break out content. Kind of greys
the lines between what is search and what is browsing categories, which is a
great thing actually. Thanks for the help.
Tim
On 9/9/06, Erik Hatc
On Sep 9, 2006, at 8:15 AM, Tim Archambault wrote:
What is "faceted browsing"? Maybe an example of a site interface
that is
using it would be good. Dumb question, I know.
Faceted browsing is like this: http://shopper.cnet.com/ and http://
www.nines.org/collex
In Collex, the "constrain fu
Hoss,
What is "faceted browsing"? Maybe an example of a site interface that is
using it would be good. Dumb question, I know.
On 9/8/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey everybody, I just wanted to officially announce that as of the
solr-2006-09-08.zip nightly build, Solr suppo
Hey everybody, I just wanted to officially announce that as of the
solr-2006-09-08.zip nightly build, Solr supports some simple Faceted
Searching options right out of the box.
Both the StandardRequestHandler and DisMaxRequestHandler now support some
query params for specifying simple queries to u
26 matches
Mail list logo
