Since Span is the only way to solve the problem, I won't mind re-indexing.
It's just that I have never done it before.
We've got 80G of indexed data replicated on two nodes in a cluster. Is
there a preferred way to go about re-indexing?
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
Hi,
Changing value of omitTermFreqAndPositions requires re-indexing, unfortunately.
And I remembered that you don't want to reindex. It looks like we are out of
options.
Ahmet
On Tuesday, April 8, 2014 12:45 AM, Vijay Kokatnur
wrote:
Yes I did restart solr, but did not re-index. Is that
Yes I did restart solr, but did not re-index. Is that necessary? We've
got 80G of indexed data, is there a "preferred" way of doing it without
impacting performance?
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Did restart solr and you re-index after schema change?
>On Sa
Hi,
Did restart solr and you re-index after schema change?
On Saturday, April 5, 2014 2:39 AM, Vijay Kokatnur
wrote:
I had already tested with omitTermFreqAndPositions="false" . I still got the
same error.
Is there something that I am overlooking?
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Ahmet Ars
I had already tested with omitTermFreqAndPositions="false" . I still got
the same error.
Is there something that I am overlooking?
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> Hi Vijay,
>
> Add omitTermFreqAndPositions="false" attribute to fieldType definitions.
>
> omitTermFreq
Sounds good... for Lucene users, but for Solr users... sounds like a Jira is
needed.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ahmet Arslan
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 4:54 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org ; kokatnur.vi...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Searching multivalue fields
Hi Vijay,
After reading the documentation it seems that following query is what you are
after. It will return OrderId:345 without matching OrderId:123
SpanQuery q1 = new SpanTermQuery(new Term("BookingRecordId", "234"));
SpanQuery q2 = new SpanTermQuery(new Term("OrderLineType", "11"));
SpanQu
Hi Vijay,
I personally don't understand joins very well. Just a guess may be
FieldMaskingSpanQuery could be used?
http://blog.griddynamics.com/2011/07/solr-experience-search-parent-child.html
Ahmet
On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 9:46 PM, Vijay Kokatnur
wrote:
Hi,
I am bumping this thread a
Hi,
I am bumping this thread again one last time to see if anyone has a
solution.
In it's current state, our application is storing child items as multivalue
fields. Consider some orders, for example -
{
OrderId:123
BookingRecordId : ["145", "987", "*234*"]
OrderLineType : ["11", "12", "*13*"
