is hard.
quote: http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruno_Munari
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Searching-in-multiple-cores-via-SolrJ-tp4020320p4020359.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
thanks anyway, Shawn.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Carlos Alexandro Becker wrote:
> hmm... the less-horrible way I could think (if solr doesn't support it by
> default), is to create another core that "mix" the informations from other
> cores, and then, search in it.
>
> But, well, it would
hmm... the less-horrible way I could think (if solr doesn't support it by
default), is to create another core that "mix" the informations from other
cores, and then, search in it.
But, well, it would be ugly.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 11/14/2012 10:48 AM, Carlos
On 11/14/2012 10:48 AM, Carlos Alexandro Becker wrote:
Hm, and in the case of my cores have different schemes?
You might have to do all the heavy lifting yourself, after using SolrJ
to retrieve the results. I will say that I have no idea -- there may be
ways you can avoid doing that. I hope
Hm, and in the case of my cores have different schemes?
Thanks in advance.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 11/14/2012 10:19 AM, Carlos Alexandro Becker wrote:
>
>> What's the best way to search in multiple cores and merge the results
>> using
>> solrj?
>>
>
> Your bes
On 11/14/2012 10:19 AM, Carlos Alexandro Becker wrote:
What's the best way to search in multiple cores and merge the results using
solrj?
Your best bet really is to have Solr do this for you with distributed
search. You can add the shards parameter to your queries easily with
SolrJ, or you c
