Hi Shawn,
We have already switched the request method to POST.
I am going to try the term query parser soon. I will post the performance
difference against the IN syntax here later.
Thanks!
2015-11-20 15:23 GMT-08:00 Shawn Heisey :
> On 11/20/2015 4:09 PM, jichi wrote:
> > Thanks for the quick
On 11/20/2015 4:09 PM, jichi wrote:
> Thanks for the quick replies, Alex and Jack!
>
>> definitely can improve on the ORing the ids with
> Going to try that! But I guess it would still hit the maxBooleanClauses=1024
> threshold.
The terms query parser does not have a limit like boolean queries do.
Thanks for the quick replies, Alex and Jack!
> definitely can improve on the ORing the ids with
Going to try that! But I guess it would still hit the maxBooleanClauses=1024
threshold.
> 1. Are you trying to retrieve a large number of documents, or simply
perform queries against a subset of the in
1. Are you trying to retrieve a large number of documents, or simply
perform queries against a subset of the index?
2. How many unique queries are you expecting to perform against each
specific filter set of IDs?
3. How often does the set of IDs change?
4. Is there more than one filter set of ID
I don't know what to do about 30K ids, but you definitely can improve
on the ORing the ids with
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Parsers#OtherParsers-TermsQueryParser
Regards,
Alex.
Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates:
http://www.solr-start.c
Hi,
I am using Solr 4.7.0 to search text with an id filter, like this:
id:(100 OR 2 OR 5 OR 81 OR 10 ...)
The number of IDs in the boolean filter are usually less than 100, but
could sometimes be very large (around 30k IDs).
We currently set maxBooleanClauses to 1024, partitioned the IDs
