Re: Search Issue with Indexed Docs

2010-03-06 Thread Devin Austin
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > Did you reindex all your data and commit it afterward? > > Erick > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Devin Austin > wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Devin Austin > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:13 PM,

Re: Search Issue with Indexed Docs

2010-03-06 Thread Erick Erickson
Did you reindex all your data and commit it afterward? Erick On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Devin Austin wrote: > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Devin Austin > wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Erick Erickson >wrote: > > > >> I think the root of your problem is the strin

Re: Search Issue with Indexed Docs

2010-03-06 Thread Devin Austin
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Devin Austin wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Erick Erickson > wrote: > >> I think the root of your problem is the string type of your default >> field. That type is untokenized, so if you indexed >> "my name is erick", the *only* thing that would mat

Re: Search Issue with Indexed Docs

2010-03-06 Thread Devin Austin
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > I think the root of your problem is the string type of your default > field. That type is untokenized, so if you indexed > "my name is erick", the *only* thing that would match > is searching for exactly that. Searching for "erick" wouldn't

Re: Search Issue with Indexed Docs

2010-03-06 Thread Erick Erickson
I think the root of your problem is the string type of your default field. That type is untokenized, so if you indexed "my name is erick", the *only* thing that would match is searching for exactly that. Searching for "erick" wouldn't match, nor anything besides the exact and entire value I su

Re: Search Issue with Indexed Docs

2010-03-06 Thread Devin Austin
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Erick Erickson wrote: > At a guess, you're looking in the default field for the letter "i", which > has probably been removed at indexing time because it is a > stopword. Unless you specify a field (e.g. q=field:value), the search > goes against your default field (

Re: Search Issue with Indexed Docs

2010-03-06 Thread Erick Erickson
At a guess, you're looking in the default field for the letter "i", which has probably been removed at indexing time because it is a stopword. Unless you specify a field (e.g. q=field:value), the search goes against your default field (specified in schema). Two very useful tools are : the solr adm

Search Issue with Indexed Docs

2010-03-06 Thread Devin Austin
Hi all, Solr newb here. I'm attempting to index some docs and then search for them using the usual XML posts to send the document data to the app. The documents seem to be indexing as the numDocs under statistics seems to reflect the number of documents I've POSTed. However, through no medium a