There is not nearly enough information here to begin
to help you.
At minimum we need:
1> your field definition
2> the text you index
3> the query you send
You might want to review:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Best,
Erick
> On Nov 3, 2020, at 1:08 AM, Viresh Sasalawad
> wro
Hi Sir/Madam,
Am facing an issue with few keyword searches (like gazing, one) in solr.
Can you please help why these words are not listed in solr results?
Indexing is done properly.
--
Thanks and Regards
Veeresh Sasalawad
Heck, Charlie, it explains 90% of the problems I’ve personally had with
programming in general over my entire career...
> On Jul 15, 2020, at 5:08 AM, Charlie Hull wrote:
>
> On 14/07/2020 12:48, Erick Erickson wrote:
>> This is almost certainly a mismatch between what you think is
>> happenin
On 14/07/2020 12:48, Erick Erickson wrote:
This is almost certainly a mismatch between what you think is happening
and what you’ve actually told Solr to do ;).
That's a great one-line explanation of 90% of the issues people face
with Solr :-)
Charlie
Best,
Erick
On Jul 14, 2020, at 7:05
This is usually a result of either indexing or querying not quite doing what
you expect. The screenshots don’t help diagnose as they’re just the results,
but don’t really help understand why.
So here’s what I do to try to figure out why:
1> add &debug=query to the query You can check the “debug
On 4/17/2019 8:45 PM, Anuj Bhargava wrote:
I have an issue while searching on the Date field date_upload
My Schema file has the following entry for DATE Field
**
You haven't shown us the definition for pdate.
If it is what the Solr examples have, then it is a DatePointField.
My data-config
Added the following in the Schema file -
And modified
to
Still the following not working
NOW
NOW-7DAYS
NOW-30DAYS
The following has started working
fq=date_upload:[2018-12-01 TO 2019-04-17]
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 08:15, Anuj Bhargava wrote:
> I have an issue while searching on the Date fie
I have an issue while searching on the Date field date_upload
My Schema file has the following entry for DATE Field
**
My data-config.xml has the following entry -
**
*The following do not work -*
fq=date_upload:NOW (does not work)
http://localhost:8983/solr/Nlive/selec
Where do the sentence boundaries come from? Solr would not be able to
automatically identify those, but if you can feed this text as a
multi-valued field with each sentence separate, you may be able to use
something like SurroundQueryParser:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Pa
Hi Team,
I am new to solr and need your help. My problem statement is as below
I have uploaded document in solr as below. #sb# represents sentence begining
and #se# represents senetence ending. Now I want to search terms which occur in
same sentence . If I search for q=text:"Federer Wimble
t; -Original Message-
> From: meghana
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 3:25 AM
> To:
> solr-user@.apache
> Subject: Re: fuzzy search issue with PatternTokenizer Factory
>
> Jack,
>
> the regex will split tokens by anything expect alphabets , numbers, '&&#
Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: meghana
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 3:25 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: fuzzy search issue with PatternTokenizer Factory
Jack,
the regex will split tokens by anything expect alphabets , numbers, '&' ,
'-' and ns: (
roup", the pattern specifies what delimiter
> sequence will "split" the rest of the input into tokens. I suspect you
> didn't mean this.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message-
> From: meghana
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 9:01 AM
> To:
ttern specifies what delimiter
sequence will "split" the rest of the input into tokens. I suspect you
didn't mean this.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: meghana
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 9:01 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: fuzzy search issue with
this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/fuzzy-search-issue-with-PatternTokenizer-Factory-tp4057275.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
se have not been archived.
>
> I am lost as to why it hang when searching those two terms together.
> Shouldn't I get results for both words even if they are not both in a
> document?
>
> Thanks for your guidance.
>
> ZeroEffect
>
>
>
> --
> View this message
been archived.
>
> I am lost as to why it hang when searching those two terms together.
> Shouldn't I get results for both words even if they are not both in a
> document?
>
> Thanks for your guidance.
>
> ZeroEffect
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
two terms together.
Shouldn't I get results for both words even if they are not both in a
document?
Thanks for your guidance.
ZeroEffect
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Example-Multi-Word-Search-issue-tp4056651.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
, ravi.n wrote:
> Thanks.
> Can be this done by Solr or should we write Java class?
>
> Regards,
> Ravi
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-Search-Issue-tp4019816p4019939.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Thanks.
Can be this done by Solr or should we write Java class?
Regards,
Ravi
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-Search-Issue-tp4019816p4019939.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
the old Index format 2.9 to newer?
>
> This has been a show stopper for us, any help would be really appreciated.
>
> Regards,
> Ravi
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-Search-Issue-tp4019816.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
d Index format 2.9 to newer?
This has been a show stopper for us, any help would be really appreciated.
Regards,
Ravi
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-Search-Issue-tp4019816.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ingapore
> Blk 1022 Tai Seng Avenue #06-3530
> Tai Seng Ind. Est. Singapore 534415
> DID: (65) 6550 5383 FAX: (65) 6550 5459
> email: romita.s...@sg.panasonic.com
>
>
>
> From: Erick Erickson
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org,
> Date: 11/02/2012 02:42 PM
>
more
terms), then you will get ALL documents that match ANY of the terms. If you
want ONLY the documents that match ALL of the terms, set the default query
operator (q.op) to "AND".
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Romita Saha
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 4:01
From: Erick Erickson
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org,
Date: 11/02/2012 02:42 PM
Subject:Re: solr search issue
First, define a "free text search". If what you're after is that your
terms
(i.e. q=term1 term2) get spread
across multiple fields, simply add them to yo
> From: Gora Mohanty
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org,
> Date: 11/02/2012 12:36 PM
> Subject:Re: solr search issue
>
>
>
> On 2 November 2012 09:51, Romita Saha
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to search a database . In my
Hi,
Thank you for your reply. What if I want to do a free text search?
Thanks and regards,
Romita
From: Gora Mohanty
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org,
Date: 11/02/2012 12:36 PM
Subject:Re: solr search issue
On 2 November 2012 09:51, Romita Saha
wrote:
>
> Hi,
&g
On 2 November 2012 09:51, Romita Saha wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to search a database . In my database I have a field level2.
>
> My query:
> http://localhost:8983/solr/db/select/?defType=dismax&q=search%20level2&qf=data%20id^2%20&start=0&rows=11&fl=data,id
Where did you get this syntax from?
Hi,
I am trying to search a database . In my database I have a field level2.
My query:
http://localhost:8983/solr/db/select/?defType=dismax&q=search%20level2&qf=data%20id^2%20&start=0&rows=11&fl=data,id
When I make the above query, I do not get any response. However I get the
require the respo
Dear all,
Using facet date/range on a date typed field and on a distributed search
between schema compatible cores, the use of facet.mincount=1 brings a cut down
number of facet values (over 500 facet values expected, 5 facet values
retrieved). I wonder whether facet.mincount is supported on di
Dear Mrs/Mr,
Using facet date/range on a date typed field and on a distributed search
between schema compatible cores, the use of facet.mincount=1 brings a cut down
number of facet values (over 500 facet values expected, 5 facet values
retrieved). I wonder whether facet.mincount is supported on
While indexing @ is removed. You need to use your own Tokenizer which will
consider "@rohit" as one word.
Another option is to break the tweet in to two fields, @ and the
tweet. Index both the fields but don't use any tokenizer for the field "
@". Just index as it is. While querying you need to se
Hi,
We are storing a large number of tweets and blogs feeds into solr.
Now if the user searches for twitter mentions like, @rohit , records which
just contain the word rohit are also being returned. Even if we do an exact
match "@rohit", I understand this happens because of use of
WordDeli
document than previously (multivalued -
xpathentity processor)
what should be the cause of this?
and how/what changes needed so that it works as previously?
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Search-issue-while-making-multivalued-field-to
Thanks Lee for the quick response,
Let me explain it a little bit better
In the CFSEARCH tag, you use the CRITERIA attribute, what it does... By
default is that it sents to the SOLR via post the search query of the user
to the field where the text is stored in this case since I'm indexing PDF
fil
Can you see the query actually presented to solr in the logs ?
maybe capture that and then run it with a debug true in the admin pages.
sorry i cant help directly with your syntax
On 7 June 2011 23:06, Alejandro Delgadillo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I¹m having some troubles using Solr throught Coldfusio
Hi,
I¹m having some troubles using Solr throught Coldfusion, the problem right
now is that when I search for a term in a Custom field, the results
sometimes have the value that I sent to the custom field and not to the
field that contains the text, this is the cfsearch sintax that I¹m using:
E
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Did you reindex all your data and commit it afterward?
>
> Erick
>
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Devin Austin
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Devin Austin
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:13 PM,
Did you reindex all your data and commit it afterward?
Erick
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Devin Austin wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Devin Austin
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Erick Erickson >wrote:
> >
> >> I think the root of your problem is the strin
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Devin Austin wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Erick Erickson
> wrote:
>
>> I think the root of your problem is the string type of your default
>> field. That type is untokenized, so if you indexed
>> "my name is erick", the *only* thing that would mat
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> I think the root of your problem is the string type of your default
> field. That type is untokenized, so if you indexed
> "my name is erick", the *only* thing that would match
> is searching for exactly that. Searching for "erick" wouldn't
I think the root of your problem is the string type of your default
field. That type is untokenized, so if you indexed
"my name is erick", the *only* thing that would match
is searching for exactly that. Searching for "erick" wouldn't
match, nor anything besides the exact and entire value
I su
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> At a guess, you're looking in the default field for the letter "i", which
> has probably been removed at indexing time because it is a
> stopword. Unless you specify a field (e.g. q=field:value), the search
> goes against your default field (
At a guess, you're looking in the default field for the letter "i", which
has probably been removed at indexing time because it is a
stopword. Unless you specify a field (e.g. q=field:value), the search
goes against your default field (specified in schema).
Two very useful tools are :
the solr adm
Hi all,
Solr newb here. I'm attempting to index some docs and then search for them
using the usual XML posts to send the document data to the app. The
documents seem to be indexing as the numDocs under statistics seems to
reflect the number of documents I've POSTed. However, through no medium a
r
1
1
/search?q="foo bar"
*nothing*
I was wondering if I could get your thoughts if xmlpayload supports sort of
the things(with phrase search) or is there a good solution to index a doc
with many pages and one rectangle(graphical word geometry) for each term?
thank you in advance
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Phrase-search-issue-with-XMLPayload--Is-it-the-better-solution--tp27018815p27018815.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
May 21, 2009 3:48:45 AM
> Subject: Re: Phrase Search Issue
>
>
> This problem is related with the default operator in dismax. Currently OR is
> the default operator and it is behaving perfectly fine. I have changed the
> default operator in schema.xml to AND, I also have changed t
er.
>
> But it is treating as OR and returning all the records, which are having
> either of these words. I am doing this using dismax request.
>
> I would appreciate if somebody can provide me some pointers.
>
> Thanks,
> Amit Garg
>
--
View this message
hese words. I am doing this using dismax request.
I would appreciate if somebody can provide me some pointers.
Thanks,
Amit Garg
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Phrase-Search-Issue-tp23648813p23648813.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
itself. Again, the filters and analyzers have no effect
(since they never come into the picture here too)
-Kumar
-Original Message-
From: mahendra mahendra [mailto:mahendra_featu...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 12:34 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: wildcard search i
Hi,
The case sensitive wild-card search is not working for TextField type.
I have tried searching for UserName:cust*, it gave the results, but
UserName:Cust* didn't give any results. How can I make it work..
I have defined my TextField in following way.
51 matches
Mail list logo
