Yup, it's that simple! :)
Erik
On Jul 5, 2007, at 5:42 PM, Thiago Jackiw wrote:
Is it that simple? Cool, I'll give it a try.
--
Thiago Jackiw
On 7/5/07, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 12:39 -0700, Thiago Jackiw wrote:
> Is there a way for a record
Is it that simple? Cool, I'll give it a try.
--
Thiago Jackiw
On 7/5/07, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 12:39 -0700, Thiago Jackiw wrote:
> Is there a way for a record to belong to multiple facets? If so, how
> would one go about implementing it?
>
> What I'd l
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 12:39 -0700, Thiago Jackiw wrote:
> Is there a way for a record to belong to multiple facets? If so, how
> would one go about implementing it?
>
> What I'd like to accomplish would be something like:
>
> record A:
> name="John Doe"
> category_facet="Cars"
> category_facet="E
Is there a way for a record to belong to multiple facets? If so, how
would one go about implementing it?
What I'd like to accomplish would be something like:
record A:
name="John Doe"
category_facet="Cars"
category_facet="Electronics"
And when searching for "John Doe" his record would appear un
