You’ve misconfigured the startup. Although looking at the
script help it is a little confusing.
The -z parameter should be the _ensemble_. Pointing each Solr
instance three times at the same ZK instance is not at all what
you need to do.
You should start them up with the “-z” parameter set to so
I have created three different solrcloud instance running on three different
ports with external zookeeper 3 instance link with them and when I load the
data in one solrcloud instance, it successfully can be accessible from three
different solrcloud instance.
E.g:
Zookeeper
./zkServer start zoo.cfg
I won't be able to achieve the correct mapping as I did not store the
mapping info any where. I don't know if core-node1 was mapped to
shard1_recplica1 or shard2_replica1 in my old collection. But I am not
worried about that as I am not going to update any existing document.
This is what I did.
You've got it. You should be quite safe if you
1> create the same number of shards as you used to have
2> match the shard bits. I.e. collection1_shard1_replica1 as long as
the collection1_shard# parts match you should be fine. If this isn't
done correctly, the symptom will be that when you update a
Thanks Erick.
I had replicationFactor=1 in my old collection and going to have the same
config for the new collection.
When I create a new collection with number of Shards =20 and max shards per
node = 1, the shards are going to start on 20 hosts out of my 25 hosts Solr
cluster. When you say "get
That should work. The caveat here is that you need to get the each
shards index to the corresponding shard on your new collection.
Of course I'd back up _all_ of these indexes before even starting.
And one other trick. First create your collection with 1 replica per
shard (leader-only). Then copy
I have a Solr Cloud deployed on top of HDFS.
I accidentally deleted a collection using the collection API. So, ZooKeeper
cluster has lost all the info related to that collection. I don't have a
backup that I can restore from. However, I have indices and transaction
logs on HDFS.
If I create a new
Dear Mr. Heisey.
It seems that we can not send the picture or attachments to solr-user, so I
send the screen shot to your personal email, sorry to disturb!
Thanks!
Kent
2016-07-13 8:13 GMT+08:00 Shawn Heisey :
> On 7/12/2016 8:30 AM, Kent Mu wrote:
> > We have configed the maxThreads in JBOSS,
we have 5 shards and each shard with one leader and one replica.
the "3300" connections is only for one JVM. please see the follow analysis
in zabbix.
and we the solrj code as follow:
public synchronized static CloudSolrServer getSolrCloudReadServer() {
if (reviewSolrCloudReadS
On 7/12/2016 8:30 AM, Kent Mu wrote:
> We have configed the maxThreads in JBOSS, and the good news is solrcloud
> now running OK. but I another issue came across. We find the number of the
> HTTP connections is very high, and the number can be around 3300. and
> solrcloud does no release the connec
Dear Mr. Heisey.
We have configed the maxThreads in JBOSS, and the good news is solrcloud
now running OK. but I another issue came across. We find the number of the
HTTP connections is very high, and the number can be around 3300. and
solrcloud does no release the connections.
I understand that, t
Dear Mr. Heisey!
Thanks for your reply very much! as you said, I think this will be key to
the issue, and I will config "maxThreads" next week. hope it will work.
Thanks again!
2016-07-07 22:24 GMT+08:00 Shawn Heisey :
> On 7/6/2016 5:26 AM, Kent Mu wrote:
> > Hi friends!
> > *solr version: 4.9
Dear Mr. Mangar!
Thanks for your reply. we have 3 cores with 5 shards, and each shard with
one leader and one replication. now the data account goes to be 100
million, and it is still growing up.I see no connection timeout. actually
we have schedule job to commit the data every 2 hours. so the acti
On 7/6/2016 5:26 AM, Kent Mu wrote:
> Hi friends!
> *solr version: 4.9.0*
>
> I came across a problem when use solrcloud, it becomes dead lock, we got
> the java core log, it looks like the http connection pool is exhausted and
> most threads are waiting to get a free connection..
>
> I posted the
Hi Kent,
There is no point sending multiple emails for the same subject. It
distracts people from the other messages, distributes the conversation and
discourages people from helping you.
Please provide more details about your cluster.
1. How many nodes?
2. How many collections?
3. How many shard
Hi friends!
*solr version: 4.9.0*
I came across a problem when use solrcloud, it becomes dead lock, we got
the java core log, it looks like the http connection pool is exhausted and
most threads are waiting to get a free connection..
I posted the problem in JIRA, the link is
https://issues.apache
17 November 2015 at 09:05, soledede_w...@ehsy.com wrote:
>
> Yes,Thanks,But It just support (select * from A where A.id in(select id
> from B where...)) or not
> I hope It is (select a*,b.* from A a join B b on A.id = B.id)
> How to merge the result of shards
>
> Thanks
>
>
: Re: Re: how to join search mutiple collection in sorlcloud
You might want to take a look at/follow up upon SOLR-8297
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8297>
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 at 04:14 soledede_w...@ehsy.com
wrote:
>
> Thanks Erick
>
> I think if can use hash
the result in a node.
>
>
> soledede_w...@ehsy.com
>
> From: Erick Erickson
> Date: 2015-11-17 11:10
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Re: how to join search mutiple collection in sorlcloud
> In a word, no. At least probably not.
>
> There are some JIRA tickets dealing with d
Thanks Erick
I think if can use hash for doc_id to all shards, then do join,Last merge the
result in a node.
soledede_w...@ehsy.com
From: Erick Erickson
Date: 2015-11-17 11:10
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: how to join search mutiple collection in sorlcloud
In a word, no. At least probably not
In a word, no. At least probably not.
There are some JIRA tickets dealing with distributed joins, and some
with certain restrictions, specifically if the second (from)
collection can be reproduced on every slice of the first (to)
collection.
In the trunk (6.0), there's the ParallelSQL stuff which
Dear @solr_lucene
currently,I am using solr5.3.1,I have a requirement, I need search like in
relation database(select * from A ,B where A.id=B.id),Can we implments with
solr5.3 in SolrCloud mode,I have two collection,2 shards per collection.
Help me please.
Thanks
soledede_w...@ehsy.
;s a writeup on tlogs etc. and how to control this.
http://searchhub.org/2013/08/23/understanding-transaction-logs-softcommit-and-commit-in-sorlcloud/
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Alejandro Marqués Rodríguez <
amarq...@paradigmatecnologico.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We'
Hi,
We've been experiencing some problems during search stress tests and we
don't even have a clue on why is this happening.
We have the following:
- 3 servers
- Websphere 7
- Zookeeper 3.4.5 on each server
- Solr 4.5.0 on each server
- 1 shard (so it is one leader and 2 replicas)
- The index con
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 7:20 PM, joe.cohe...@gmail.com <
joe.cohe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Rakudten.
> I had my question mis-phrased.
> What I need is being able to get the solr servers storing a collection by
> giving the zookeeper server as an input.
>
> something like:
>
> // returns a lis
ble.com/How-to-get-a-list-of-servers-per-collection-in-sorlcloud-using-java-api-tp4021863p4021883.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
- Luis Cappa
servers/urls that run a specific
> collection?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-get-a-list-of-servers-per-collection-in-sorlcloud-using-java-api-tp4021863.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
- Luis Cappa
pr 17, 2012, at 9:56 AM, emma1023 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> It hashes the id. The doc distribution is fairly even - but sizes may be
>>>>> fairly different.
>>>>>
>>>>>> How solrcloud manage distri
>> It hashes the id. The doc distribution is fairly even - but sizes may be
>>>> fairly different.
>>>>
>>>>> How solrcloud manage distribute data among shards of the same cluster
>>>> when
>>>>> you query? Is it distribute
>>> fairly different.
>>>
>>>> How solrcloud manage distribute data among shards of the same cluster
>>> when
>>>> you query? Is it distribute the data equally? What is the basis? Which
>>> part
>>>> of the code that I can fin
hards of the same cluster
>> when
>> > you query? Is it distribute the data equally? What is the basis? Which
>> part
>> > of the code that I can find about it?Thank you so much!
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > View this message in context:
; View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-sorlcloud-distribute-data-among-shards-of-the-same-cluster-tp3917323p3917323.html
> > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> - Mark Miller
> lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
>
h part
> of the code that I can find about it?Thank you so much!
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-sorlcloud-distribute-data-among-shards-of-the-same-cluster-tp3917323p3917323.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
How solrcloud manage distribute data among shards of the same cluster when
you query? Is it distribute the data equally? What is the basis? Which part
of the code that I can find about it?Thank you so much!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-sorlcloud
34 matches
Mail list logo
