Sent: Mittwoch, 12. März 2014 18:39
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Re[2]: NOT SOLVED searches for single char tokens instead of from
3 uppwards
Hi Jack,
do you know how i can use local parameters in my solrconfig? The params are
visible in the debugquery-output but solr doesn't par
ions:["" TO *] +roles:($r))
(+organisations:($org) -roles:["" TO *])
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Owen [mailto:a...@conx.ch]
Sent: Mittwoch, 12. März 2014 14:44
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re[2]: NOT SOLVED searches for single char tokens instead of from
uot;
> An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Datum: 12/03/2014 13:25
> Betreff: Re: NOT SOLVED searches for single char tokens instead of from 3
> uppwards
>
> You didn't show the new index analyzer - it's tricky to assure that index
> and query are compatible, but the A
index and
query for WDF - index generates more terms than query.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Owen
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 6:20 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: NOT SOLVED searches for single char tokens instead of from 3
uppwards
I no
e-
From: Andreas Owen
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 5:09 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: NOT SOLVED searches for single char tokens instead of from 3
uppwards
I got it roght the first time and here is my requesthandler. The field
"plain_text" is searched correctly
rch 11, 2014 5:09 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: NOT SOLVED searches for single char tokens instead of from 3
uppwards
I got it roght the first time and here is my requesthandler. The field
"plain_text" is searched correctly and has the sam fieldtype as
I got it roght the first time and here is my requesthandler. The field
"plain_text" is searched correctly and has the sam fieldtype as "title" ->
"text_de"
standard
sorry i looked at the wrong fieldtype
-Original-Nachricht-
> Von: "Andreas Owen"
> An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Datum: 11/03/2014 08:45
> Betreff: searches for single char tokens instead of from 3 uppwards
>
> i have a field with the following type:
>
>
>
>
>
