tiValued="true"/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> multiValued="true"/>
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>> stored="false"
>>>>
>>>>> multiValued="true"/
vert you definitely. So, let
me
try
this option too.
All,
Please suggest if anyone is having any other suggestion on this. I
have
to
implement it on urgent basis and i think i am very close to it.
Thanks
all
of you. I have reached to this level just because of you guys.
Thanks and R
> http://localhost:8983/solr/tgl/select?q=rheumatoid%20arthritis&wt=xml&tie=1.0&rows=200&q.op=AND&indent=true&defType=edismax&stopwords=true&lowercaseOperators=true&debugQuery=true&;
> > > > pf=topTitle^200 subtopTitle^80 indTerm^40 drugStri
le^80 indTerm^40 drugString^30 tglData^6&
> > > pf3=topTitle^200 subtopTitle^80 indTerm^40 drugString^30 tglData^6&
> > > qf=topic_title^100 subtopic_title^40 index_term^20 drug^15 content^3
> > >
> > > After making these changes, I am able to get my sea
> the
> > results in the correct order.
> >
> > Hi Modassar,
> >
> > I tried using mm=100, but the order is still the same.
> >
> > Hi Alessandro,
> >
> > I have not yet tried the slope parameter. By default it is taking it as
> 1.0
> >
rds,
Nitin
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257782.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
I have to
implement it on urgent basis and i think i am very close to it. Thanks all
of you. I have reached to this level just because of you guys.
Thanks and Regards,
Nitin
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257782.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ds and then sort
> based on your single valued fields.
>
> Either ways, you'll have to experiment and see what works best for you.
>
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:21 PM Nitin.K wrote:
>
> > Thanks Binoy..
> >
> > Actually it is throwing following err
alued="true"/>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> multiValued="true"/>
>> > > > > >> > > stored="false"
>> > > > > >> multiV
ored="true"/>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > > >> positionIncrem
; > >> > > > class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
> > > > >> > > > >> ignoreCase="true"
> > > > >> words="stopwords.txt" />
> > > > >> > class="solr.LowerC
t;> class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> > > class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
> > > >>
uot;stopwords.txt" />
> > >> > >> synonyms="synonyms.txt"
> > >> ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >&g
t;> synonyms="synonyms.txt"
> >> ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >> positionIncrementGap="100"
> >> omitTermFreqAndPositions="true&quo
individual words (i.e word-1 AND word-2)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257556.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
Solr &
w can i first search the phrase and then go to the
> > individual words (i.e word-1 AND word-2)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257556.html
> > Sent from the Solr - User m
ow, how can i first search the phrase and then go to the
> individual words (i.e word-1 AND word-2)
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257556.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Regards,
Binoy Dalal
mutual count
of both the terms and based on that, its deciding the order.
kindly let me know, how can i first search the phrase and then go to the
individual words (i.e word-1 AND word-2)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257556.html
Sent
these two fields and
also indexed them with term positions for phrase search ??
I tried using omitTermFreqAndPositions="true" and omitPositions="false" but
thats not working for me.
Thanks,
Nitin
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-
>> synonyms="synonyms.txt"
> >> ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >> positionIncrementGap="100"
> >> omitTermFreqAndPositions
p="100"
>> omitTermFreqAndPositions="true" omitNorms="true">
>>
>> > class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
>> > ignoreCase="true"
>> wo
ng
q.op="AND" in my query.
Thanks,
Nitin
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257510.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
ceTokenizerFactory"/>
> > > ignoreCase="true"
> > words="stopwords.txt" />
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I want , if user will search for a phrase then that pharse should always
> > takes the priority in comaprison to the individual words;
> >
> > Example: "Eating Disorders"
> >
> > First it will search for "Eating Disorders" together and then the
> > individual
> > words "Eating" and "Disorders"
> > but while searching for individual words, it will always return those
> > documents where both the words should exist for which i am already using
> > q.op="AND" in my query.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nitin
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257510.html
> > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>
--
Regards,
Binoy Dalal
a phrase then that pharse should always
> takes the priority in comaprison to the individual words;
>
> Example: "Eating Disorders"
>
> First it will search for "Eating Disorders" together and then the
> individual
> words "Eating" and "Disorders"
> but while searching for individual words, it will always return those
> documents where both the words should exist for which i am already using
> q.op="AND" in my query.
>
> Thanks,
> Nitin
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257510.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
rds should exist for which i am already using
q.op="AND" in my query.
Thanks,
Nitin
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257510.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
e priority to the phrase search. Kindly suggest on
> this.
> I am using edismax parser right now.
> Using pf, pf2 and pf3 parameters but that too are not working properly.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257
context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257420.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257378.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Regards,
Binoy Dalal
Thanks Binoy..
Actually it is throwing following error:
can not sort on multivalued field: index_term
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367p4257378.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
order of no. of occurrences inside the content
field.
Kindly help in this. I will be really thankful
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detecti
x_term and drug then the documents
> should be ranked in the order of no. of occurrences inside the content
> field.
>
>
> Kindly help in this. I will be really thankful
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Regards,
Binoy Dalal
this. I will be really thankful
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-ranking-tp4257367.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Chris,
An example for point 3 could be -
&boost=recip(field(domainRank),0.1,1,1)
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#recip
"recip(x,m,a,b) implementing a/(m*x+b). m,a,b are constants, x is any
numeric field or arbitrarily complex function."
So with these values when domainRank is 1 it w
Dear Varun,
Thank you for your replies, I managed to get point 1 & 2 done, but for the
boost query, I am unable to figure it out. Could you be kind enough to
point me to an example or maybe advice a bit more on that one?
Thanks for your help,
Chris
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Varun Thacker
Hi Chris,
I think what you are looking for could be solved using the eDismax query
parser.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+Extended+DisMax+Query+Parser
1. Your Query Fields ( qf ) would be - "urlKeywords^60 title^40 fulltxt^1"
2. To check on adultFlag:N you could use &fq=ad
Hi,
I have a document structure that looks like the below. I would like to
implement something like -
(urlKeywords:"+keyword+" AND domainRank:[3 TO 1] AND adultFlag:N)^60 " +
"OR (title:"+keyword+" AND domainRank:[3 TO 1] AND adultFlag:N)^20 " +
"OR (title:"+keyword+" AND domainRank:[1
t;> So my question is that why did the rows containing the word "impression"
> >> got
> >> ranked higher than the rows containing the word "impress" when I
> searched
> >> for "impress"?
> >>
> >>
> > The "text&
On 09.03.2010 16:01 Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
>> I kind of suspected stemming to be the reason behind this.
>> But I consider stemming to be a good feature.
>
> This is the side effect of stemming. Stemming increases recall while harming
> precision.
But most people want the best possible combinat
than the rows containing the word "impress" when I searched
>> for "impress"?
>>
>>
> The "text" type is configured to do stemming on the input. So I'm guessing
> that "impression" and "impress" both stem to the same form. You can remove
> the EnglishPorterFilterFactory from the text type if you don't need
> stemming.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Confused-by-Solr-Ranking-tp27834227p27836299.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> I kind of suspected stemming to be the reason behind this.
> But I consider stemming to be a good feature.
This is the side effect of stemming. Stemming increases recall while harming
precision.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 4:38 PM, abhishes wrote:
>
> I am indexing a column in a database. I have chosen field type of text for
> this column (this type was defined in the sample schema file which comes in
> the Solr Example).
>
> When I search for the word "impress" and top 3 results. I get these
>
>
> > I kind of suspected stemming to be the reason behind this.
> > But I consider stemming to be a good feature.
>
> This is the side effect of stemming. Stemming increases recall while
> harming precision.
>
This is a side effect of stemming, the way it is currently implemented in
Lucene. Ste
when I searched
for "impress"?
My field type Text is defined as follows in the schema.
--
View this message in context:
h
: I am not really clear to what the analysis mode is supposed to give me. It
: requires me to specify a field when I specify a query. What does that do?
: Also, I don't see anything in the analyzer to explain the weighting of a
: particular document.
i think what Otis ment is that the analysis too
t. Am I understanding was
> RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory does incorrectly?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-regarding-Solr-ranking-tp15719752p15768743.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: oleg_gnatovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 1:33:44 PM
> Subject: Re: Question regarding Solr ranking
>
>
> Sorry about the previous message, I had some for
gt;
> protected="protwords.txt"/>
>
>
>
>
> Forgive me if I am wrong, but shouldn't the
> RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory have the string "Pizza... Pizza...
> Pizza... Pizza... Pizza... Pizza... Pizza... Pizza... Pizza... Pizza...
> Pizza... Pizza... Pizza... Pizza... Pizza... Pizza... Pizza... Pizza...
> Pizza... Pizza... Pizza..." Count as simplu one Pizza?
> I'd appreciate any help I can get!
>
> Thanks!
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-regarding-Solr-ranking-tp15719752p15719834.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
zza... Pizza... Pizza... Pizza... Pizza...
Pizza... Pizza... Pizza... Pizza... Pizza... Pizza... Pizza... Pizza...
Pizza... Pizza... Pizza..." Count as simplu one Pizza?
I'd appreciate any help I can get!
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-r
48 matches
Mail list logo
