On 2/23/2018 2:28 PM, Hodder, Rick wrote:
> Combining everything into one query is what I'd prefer because as you said,
> one would think that with everything in the same query, the score would
> organize everything nicely.
I don't recall writing anything like that. How did you infer that from
riday, February 23, 2018 10:41 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SOLR Score Range Changed
The difference seems due to the fact that default similarity in solr 7 is
BM25 while it used to be TF-IDF in solr 4. As you realised, BM25 function is
smoother.
You can configure schema.xml t
Hi Shawn,
Thanks for your help - I'm still finding my way in the weeds of SOLR.
Combining everything into one query is what I'd prefer because as you said, one
would think that with everything in the same query, the score would organize
everything nicely.
>>Assuming you're using the default re
The difference seems due to the fact that default similarity in solr 7 is
BM25 while it used to be TF-IDF in solr 4. As you realised, BM25 function
is smoother.
You can configure schema.xml to use ClassicSimilarity, for instance
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/major-changes-from-solr-5-to-
On 2/22/2018 9:50 AM, Hodder, Rick wrote:
I am migrating from SOLR 4.10.2 to SOLR 7.1.
All seems to be going well, except for one thing: the score that is coming back
for the resulting documents is giving different scores.
The absolute score has no meaning when you change something -- the
in
I am migrating from SOLR 4.10.2 to SOLR 7.1.
All seems to be going well, except for one thing: the score that is coming back
for the resulting documents is giving different scores.
The core uses a schema. Here's the schema info for the field that i am
searching on:
When searching maxrows=75