If I drop childNo_s:123456 part, the result will return both parent and
child, which is what I want.
But this will match all the children, since the only filter now is
contentType:child.
It didn't work if I put only childNo_s:123456 and remove the
contentType:child part.
Regards,
Edwin
On 9 Aug
I wonder why {!parent} doesn't have subordinate clause. I suggest to drop
childNo_s:123456 part of child filter just to get something to start from.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> Hi Mikhail,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
> I tried this, but it only returns the parent'
Hi Mikhail,
Thanks for your reply.
I tried this, but it only returns the parent's record and not the child
record.
http://localhost/solr/collection1/select?q={!parent+which%3D%22contentType:parent%22}&fl=*,[child+parentFilter%3D$parent_filter+childFilter%3D$child_filter]&parent_filter=contentType
Hello Edwin,
Have you tried to combine q={!parent ..}... &fl=*,[child ...] ?
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would like to check, is it possible to return certain fields from parent's
> record, when we are searching for fields that are only contained in chil
Hi,
Would like to check, is it possible to return certain fields from parent's
record, when we are searching for fields that are only contained in child
records.
For example, for this query:
http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/select?q=childField:123
The child field can only be found in child
