On 8/5/2019 7:34 AM, Alexander Sherbakov wrote:
Which stopped working in Solr 8, so we mowed this to solrconfig.xml as:
AND
Now, this search gives 0 results while previously it worked fine and returned 2
records:
[ path=select parameters={fq: ["type:Member"], sort: "score desc", q: "u...@gmail.
Hi all,
We upgraded our Solr cluster from 5 to 8 and I've found a difference in search
results.
Previously we had this in the schema.xml:
Which stopped working in Solr 8, so we mowed this to solrconfig.xml as:
AND
Now, this search gives 0 results while previously it worked fine and returned 2
me results for each facet, aside
> as the count (for example, three results for "tiger" and three more for
> "lion")
>
> I have read some similar questions (Solr Facetting - Showing First 10
> results and Other
> <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1808515/so
r
> "lion")
>
> I have read some similar questions (Solr Facetting - Showing First 10
> results and Other
> <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1808515/solr-
> facetting-showing-first-10-results-and-other>
> or SOLR - Querying Facets, return N results per Facet
> &
quot;tiger" and three more for
"lion")
I have read some similar questions (Solr Facetting - Showing First 10
results and Other
<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1808515/solr-facetting-showing-first-10-results-and-other>
or SOLR - Querying Facets, return N results per Face
Thanks - I'll look at it...
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Maybe rerankqparserplugin?
>
> On Aug 12, 2016 11:54, "John Bickerstaff"
> wrote:
>
> > @Hossman -- thanks again.
> >
> > I've made the following change and so far things look good. I couldn't
> see
> > debug
Maybe rerankqparserplugin?
On Aug 12, 2016 11:54, "John Bickerstaff" wrote:
> @Hossman -- thanks again.
>
> I've made the following change and so far things look good. I couldn't see
> debug or find results for what I put in for $func, so I just removed it,
> but making modifications as you su
@Hossman -- thanks again.
I've made the following change and so far things look good. I couldn't see
debug or find results for what I put in for $func, so I just removed it,
but making modifications as you suggested appears to be working.
Including the actual line from my endpoint XML in case t
Thanks! I'll check it out.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Susheel Kumar
wrote:
> Not exactly sure what you are looking from chaining the results but similar
> functionality is available in Streaming expressions where result of inner
> expressions are passed to outer expressions and so on
> h
Not exactly sure what you are looking from chaining the results but similar
functionality is available in Streaming expressions where result of inner
expressions are passed to outer expressions and so on
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Streaming+Expressions
HTH
Susheel
On Fri, Au
Hossman - many thanks again for your comprehensive and very helpful answer!
All,
I am (possibly mis-remembering) reading something about being able to pass
the results of one query to another query... Essentially "chaining" result
sets.
I have looked in docs and can't find anything on a quick s
Thanks!
To answer your questions, while I digest the rest of that information...
I'm using the hon-lucene-synonyms.5.0.4.jar from here:
https://github.com/healthonnet/hon-lucene-synonyms
The config looks like this - and IIRC, is simply a copy from the
recommended cofig on the site mentioned abov
: First let me say that this is very possibly the "x - y problem" so let me
: state up front what my ultimate need is -- then I'll ask about the thing I
: imagine might help... which, of course, is heavily biased in the direction
: of my experience coding Java and writing SQL...
Thank you so muc
First let me say that this is very possibly the "x - y problem" so let me
state up front what my ultimate need is -- then I'll ask about the thing I
imagine might help... which, of course, is heavily biased in the direction
of my experience coding Java and writing SQL...
I have a piece of a query
-filtering-in-solr/ , but other
custom logic.
20.01.2015, 00:25, "vit" :
> Unfortunately grouping will not work here since my field is multi-valued.
> So I need another solution.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Dist
Unfortunately grouping will not work here since my field is multi-valued.
So I need another solution.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Distinct-Results-from-Solr-Query-tp4180471p4180499.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
see the total
number of matches in that group.
Hope it helps,
- Original Message -
From: "vit"
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 1:56:43 PM
Subject: Re: Distinct Results from Solr Query
In other words I need to pick only one document per the field va
In other words I need to pick only one document per the field value.
Say I have a filed cat_id. For each value of this filed returned I need to
return only 1 document and I do not care which one.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Distinct-Results-from-Solr
I am using Solr 4.2
In the ressults set we are getting documents with the same field value.
Is it possible to indicate in the query that we need results with distinct
value of this field?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Distinct-Results-from-Solr-Query
Thanks Erick.
It seems the approach suggested by you is the one which I was looking for ,
thanks a lot for reply.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-get-unique-latest-results-from-solr-tp4080034p4080228.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
ate query (using the method I
> suggested) for each of the 10 employees, one at a time.
>
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Alok Bhandari
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:07 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: how to get unique l
, 2013 10:07 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: how to get unique latest results from solr
Thanks Jack.
It may be the case that I was unable to explain the query correctly.
Actually I don't want it for a single employee I want it for all the
employees that are updated in that time
times then I
want latest entry per employee updated in the given time range.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-get-unique-latest-results-from-solr-tp4080034p4080052.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Do your time range query, sort by the time field as "descending", and take
the first result.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alok Bhandari
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 9:08 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: how to get unique latest results from solr
:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-get-unique-latest-results-from-solr-tp4080034.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
If you need just the count of the results found, check the numFound.
If you would like to get all the results possible in one go, you could try
rows=-1. This may impact on your server a lot, so be careful.
If you have a single non-sharded index, try pagination
(start=offset&rows=window_size) inst
im a beginner in using solr.
i know that you can either use ajax solr or solr-php-client to get the
search results from solr.
but which should i use or are there occasions you have to choose one
of them?
for example, which one is a better solution for autocompletion and
which one is
Or maybe tweak the "splitOnCaseChange" property in the
WordDelimiterFilterFactory for the text field.
Cheers
Avlesh
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Stephen Weiss wrote:
> If I'm not mistaken, you should index name as field type "string" - right
> now you are probably using "text" so it is token
If I'm not mistaken, you should index name as field type "string" -
right now you are probably using "text" so it is tokenizing on the
Uppercase characters. If you use "string" type this shouldn't
happen. You could use a copyField to make a separate "name_string"
field so that you can do
Hi,
Can some one help me with the below situation?
To elaborate more on this.
Assuming i give "BHASKAR" as input string.
Scenario 1: It should give me search results pertaining to BHASKAR only.
Select * from MASTER where name ="Bhaskar";
Example:It should not display search results as "ChandarB
asekar
Subject: Fetching Query Results from Solr
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Thursday, August 20, 2009, 2:48 AM
Hi,
I am using Solr to retrive records and display them thru carrot.
Assuming that i give "Google" as search , it will display me all the
records relating to
andrasekar wrote:
From: bhaskar chandrasekar
Subject: Fetching Query Results from Solr
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Thursday, August 20, 2009, 2:48 AM
Hi,
I am using Solr to retrive records and display them thru carrot.
Assuming that i give "Google" as search , it will displa
Hi,
I am using Solr to retrive records and display them thru carrot.
Assuming that i give "Google" as search , it will display me all the records
relating to that.
It should give me exact word search only.
It shld not look for combination of words in the search query and display them.
How can i
33 matches
Mail list logo
