On 12/9/06, Tracey Jaquith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hey, this bit me last week, too ;-)
If there's a natural place in the documentation that you can think of
that would prevent other people from making the same mistake, feel
free to add it. The wiki is open to all!
Anyway, glad to hear Sol
writer 8GB quad intel)
handles about 3 query req/sec and often has CPU at 100% and mem at
50%.
index for slightly *smaller* docset is a "WTF?" 23GB)
--tracey
Andrew Nagy wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, December 8
- Original Message -
From: Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, December 8, 2006 6:01 pm
Subject: Re: Result: numFound inaccuracies
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> start is 0 based :-)
>
Man do I feel dumb!
Andrew
On 12/8/06, Andrew Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello, me again.
I have been running some extensive tests of my search engine and have
been seeing inaccuracies with the "numFound" attribute. It tends to
return 1 more than what is actually show in the XML.
Is this a bug, or could I be doing
Hello, me again.
I have been running some extensive tests of my search engine and have
been seeing inaccuracies with the "numFound" attribute. It tends to
return 1 more than what is actually show in the XML.
Is this a bug, or could I be doing something wrong?
I have a specific example in fr
