AW: Restricting Facet to FilterQuery in combination with mincount

2010-01-20 Thread Chantal Ackermann
Thank you, Chris! That did clarify it. :-) Cheers, Chantal Von: Chris Hostetter [hossman_luc...@fucit.org] Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Januar 2010 23:27 An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Betreff: Re: Restricting Facet to FilterQuery in combination with mincount

Re: Restricting Facet to FilterQuery in combination with mincount

2010-01-19 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Now, I was wondering whether it is possible to find that out. It would allow : to show 0 counts of values that are produced by the query (q), and at the same : time exclude all facet values that are already excluded by the filter query. : : Applying facetting to a subset (subselect / filterset)

Re: Restricting Facet to FilterQuery in combination with mincount

2010-01-19 Thread Chantal Ackermann
Hi Shalin, thanks for taking your time (reading it twice!). Rephrasing the question: (suppose mincount=0 and facet.limit > all possible facet values) Currently, the facet results include ALL values for that facet field. Say I have a field color and when I look at the statistics (LUKE), I can s

Re: Restricting Facet to FilterQuery in combination with mincount

2010-01-19 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Chantal Ackermann < chantal.ackerm...@btelligent.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > is it possible to restrict the returned facets to only those that apply to > the filter query but still use mincount=0? Keeping those that have a count > of 0 but apply to the filter, and at

Restricting Facet to FilterQuery in combination with mincount

2010-01-13 Thread Chantal Ackermann
Hi all, is it possible to restrict the returned facets to only those that apply to the filter query but still use mincount=0? Keeping those that have a count of 0 but apply to the filter, and at the same time leaving out those that are not covered by the filter (and thus 0, as well). Some l