).
>>
>> In such a case the old master might have uncommitted updates.
>>
>> JRJ
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 3:17 PM
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
rmal network).
>
> In such a case the old master might have uncommitted updates.
>
> JRJ
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 3:17 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re
uncommitted updates.
JRJ
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 3:17 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Replication with an HA master
Hello,
- Original Message -
> From: Robert Stewart
> To: sol
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > In the case of using a shared (SAN) index between 2 masters, what happens
> if the
> > live master fails in such a way that the index remains "locked" (such
> > as if some hardware failure and it did not unl
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Brandon Ramirez <
brandon_rami...@elementk.com> wrote:
> Using a shared volume crossed my mind too, but I discarded the idea because
> of literature I have read about Lucene performing poorly against remote file
> systems. But then I suppose a SAN wouldn't be a re
Hello,
- Original Message -
> From: Robert Stewart
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 3:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Replication with an HA master
>
> In the case of using a shared (SAN) index between 2 masters, what happens if
>
From: Brandon Ramirez
>> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 2:55 PM
>> Subject: RE: Replication with an HA master
>>
>> Using a shared volume crossed my mind too, but I discarded the idea because
>> of literature
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>From: Brandon Ramirez
>To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
>Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 2:55 PM
>Subject: RE: Replicatio
z | Office: 585.214.5413 | Fax: 585.295.4848
Software Engineer II | Element K | www.elementk.com
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 2:28 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Replication with an HA master
A few al
://search-lucene.com/
>
>From: Robert Stewart
>To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>Sent: Friday, October 7, 2011 10:22 AM
>Subject: Re: Replication with an HA master
>
>Your idea sounds like the correct path. Setup 2 masters, one running in
>
Your idea sounds like the correct path. Setup 2 masters, one running in
"slave" mode which pulls replicas from the live master. When/if live master
goes down, you just reconfigure and restart the backup master to be the live
master. You'd also need to then start data import on the backup mast
We are getting ready to start a project using Solr as our backend search engine
and I am trying to devise a deployment architecture that works for us. We
definitely need a master/slave replication strategy, that's for sure, but my
concern is the master becomes a single point of failure.
Fortun
12 matches
Mail list logo