Re: Replication process on Master/Slave slowing down slave read/search performance

2013-07-15 Thread Walter Underwood
ext: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Replication-process-on-Master-Slave-slowing-down-slave-read-search-performance-tp707934p4078090.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Replication process on Master/Slave slowing down slave read/search performance

2013-07-15 Thread adityab
://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Replication-process-on-Master-Slave-slowing-down-slave-read-search-performance-tp707934p4078090.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Replication process on Master/Slave slowing down slave read/search performance

2010-04-09 Thread Walter Underwood
You don't need multi-core. Solr already does this automatically. It creates a new Searcher and auto-warms the cache. But, it will still be slow. If you use auto-warming, it uses most of one CPU, which slows down queries during warming. Also, warming isn't perfect, so queries will be slower afte

Re: Replication process on Master/Slave slowing down slave read/search performance

2010-04-09 Thread Marco Martinez
Hi Marcin, This is because when you do the replication, all the caches are rebuild cause the index has changed, so the searchs performance decrease. You can change your architecture to a multicore one to reduce the impact of the replication. Using two cores, one to do the replication, and other to

Replication process on Master/Slave slowing down slave read/search performance

2010-04-09 Thread Marcin
Hi guys, I have noticed that Master/Slave replication process is slowing down slave read/search performance during replication being done. please help cheers