Re: Replicas for same shard not in sync

2016-04-27 Thread Jeff Wartes
;>>>retries in the event of failure? >>>>> >>>>>Best, >>>>>Erick >>>>> >>>>>On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 6:13 AM, tedsolr wrote: >>>>>> I've done a bit of reading - found some other posts with similar >>>>>> questions. >>>>>> So I gather "Optimizing" a collection is rarely a good idea. It does not >>>>>> need to be condensed to a single segment. I also read that it's up to the >>>>>> client to keep track of updates in case commits don't happen on all the >>>>>> replicas. Solr will commit and return success as long as one replica gets >>>>>> the update. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have a state where the two replicas for one collection are out of sync. >>>>>> One has some updates that the other does not. And I don't have log data >>>>>> to >>>>>> tell me what the differences are. This happened during a maintenance >>>>>> window >>>>>> when the servers got restarted while a large index job was running. >>>>>> Normally >>>>>> this doesn't cause a problem, but it did last Thursday. >>>>>> >>>>>> What I plan to do is select the replica I believe is incomplete and >>>>>> delete >>>>>> it. Then add a new one. I was just hoping Solr had a solution for this - >>>>>> maybe using the ZK transaction logs to replay some updates, or force a >>>>>> resync between the replicas. >>>>>> >>>>>> I will also implement a fix to prevent Solr from restarting unless one of >>>>>> its config files has changed. No need to bounce Solr just for kicks. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> View this message in context: >>>>>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Replicas-for-same-shard-not-in-sync-tp4272236p4272602.html >>>>>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>

Re: Replicas for same shard not in sync

2016-04-26 Thread Erick Erickson
posts with similar >>>>> questions. >>>>> So I gather "Optimizing" a collection is rarely a good idea. It does not >>>>> need to be condensed to a single segment. I also read that it's up to the >>>>> client to keep track of up

Re: Replicas for same shard not in sync

2016-04-26 Thread Jeff Wartes
27;t have log data to >>>> tell me what the differences are. This happened during a maintenance window >>>> when the servers got restarted while a large index job was running. >>>> Normally >>>> this doesn't cause a problem, but it did last Thursday. >>>> >>>> What I plan to do is select the replica I believe is incomplete and delete >>>> it. Then add a new one. I was just hoping Solr had a solution for this - >>>> maybe using the ZK transaction logs to replay some updates, or force a >>>> resync between the replicas. >>>> >>>> I will also implement a fix to prevent Solr from restarting unless one of >>>> its config files has changed. No need to bounce Solr just for kicks. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Replicas-for-same-shard-not-in-sync-tp4272236p4272602.html >>>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>

Re: Replicas for same shard not in sync

2016-04-25 Thread Erick Erickson
gt;> What I plan to do is select the replica I believe is incomplete and delete >>> it. Then add a new one. I was just hoping Solr had a solution for this - >>> maybe using the ZK transaction logs to replay some updates, or force a >>> resync between the replicas. >>> >>> I will also implement a fix to prevent Solr from restarting unless one of >>> its config files has changed. No need to bounce Solr just for kicks. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Replicas-for-same-shard-not-in-sync-tp4272236p4272602.html >>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: Replicas for same shard not in sync

2016-04-25 Thread David Smith
aybe using the ZK transaction logs to replay some updates, or force a >> resync between the replicas. >> >> I will also implement a fix to prevent Solr from restarting unless one of >> its config files has changed. No need to bounce Solr just for kicks. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Replicas-for-same-shard-not-in-sync-tp4272236p4272602.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Replicas for same shard not in sync

2016-04-25 Thread tedsolr
ut to fix the current situation, deleting a replica is the way to go? It happens to be very small - lucky me. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Replicas-for-same-shard-not-in-sync-tp4272236p4272721.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Replicas for same shard not in sync

2016-04-25 Thread Erick Erickson
just hoping Solr had a solution for this - > maybe using the ZK transaction logs to replay some updates, or force a > resync between the replicas. > > I will also implement a fix to prevent Solr from restarting unless one of > its config files has changed. No need to bounce Solr ju

Re: Replicas for same shard not in sync

2016-04-25 Thread tedsolr
n context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Replicas-for-same-shard-not-in-sync-tp4272236p4272602.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Replicas for same shard not in sync

2016-04-23 Thread jimi.hullegard
hain definition: indexationtime /Jimi From: tedsolr Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 8:48 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Replicas for same shard not in sync I have a SolrCloud setup with v5.2.1 - just two hosts. A ZK ensemble of 3 hosts. Just today, cust

Re: Replicas for same shard not in sync

2016-04-22 Thread Erick Erickson
for > the one shard? Or reload the collection? Do I need to delete the replica and > build a new one? > > Thanks! > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Replicas-for-same-shard-not-in-sync-tp4272236.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Replicas for same shard not in sync

2016-04-22 Thread tedsolr
27;s the proper way to re-sync? Should I restart the host with the out of sync collection? Or click the "optimize" button for the one shard? Or reload the collection? Do I need to delete the replica and build a new one? Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3