Re: Reindex of document leaves old fields behind

2015-05-22 Thread tuxedomoon
-document-leaves-old-fields-behind-tp4206710p4207164.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Reindex of document leaves old fields behind

2015-05-21 Thread tuxedomoon
: "56769138-4a03-4ed6-8b29-8030d0941b08"} , "abcsourceEnvironment" : "fishing" , "abcstate" : true}, { "abcpublished" : { "$date" : "2015-05-19T21:21:31.731Z"} , "abcpublishedBy" : "jelly" , "abctargetEnviro

Re: Reindex of document leaves old fields behind

2015-05-21 Thread tuxedomoon
View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Reindex-of-document-leaves-old-fields-behind-tp4206710p4206946.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Reindex of document leaves old fields behind

2015-05-21 Thread tuxedomoon
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Reindex-of-document-leaves-old-fields-behind-tp4206710p4206908.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Reindex of document leaves old fields behind

2015-05-21 Thread Erick Erickson
placement. I will try the above test via SolrJ. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Reindex-of-document-leaves-old-fields-behind-tp4206710p4206886.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Reindex of document leaves old fields behind

2015-05-21 Thread tuxedomoon
f SolrJ is somehow involved in performing an atomic update rather than replacement. I will try the above test via SolrJ. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Reindex-of-document-leaves-old-fields-behind-tp4206710p4206886.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list

Re: Reindex of document leaves old fields behind

2015-05-21 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 5/21/2015 9:54 AM, tuxedomoon wrote: > I'm doing all my index to leader 1 and have not specified any router > configuration. But there is an equal distribution of 240M docs across 5 > shards. I think I've been stating I have 3 shards in these posts, I have 5, > sorry. > > How do I know what k

Re: Reindex of document leaves old fields behind

2015-05-21 Thread tuxedomoon
View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Reindex-of-document-leaves-old-fields-behind-tp4206710p4206869.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Reindex of document leaves old fields behind

2015-05-21 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 5/21/2015 9:02 AM, tuxedomoon wrote: > l>> If it is "implicit" then >>> you may have indexed the new document to a different shard, which means >>> that it is now in your index more than once, and which one gets returned >>> may not be predictable. > > If a document with uniqueKey "1234" is ass

Re: Reindex of document leaves old fields behind

2015-05-21 Thread tuxedomoon
ed to a shard by SolrCloud, implicit routing won't a reindex of "1234" be assigned to the same shard? If not you'd have dups all over the cluster. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Reindex-of-document-leaves-old-fields-behind-tp420671

Re: Reindex of document leaves old fields behind

2015-05-21 Thread tuxedomoon
-- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Reindex-of-document-leaves-old-fields-behind-tp4206710p4206841.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Reindex of document leaves old fields behind

2015-05-20 Thread Erick Erickson
ch reindex. > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Reindex-of-document-leaves-old-fields-behind-tp4206710p4206732.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Reindex of document leaves old fields behind

2015-05-20 Thread tuxedomoon
request for the same document with cache busting produce the same unwanted fields, so I doubt the "correct" one is hiding somewhere. I can also see the timestamp going up with each reindex. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Reindex-of-document-leaves-

Re: Reindex of document leaves old fields behind

2015-05-20 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 5/20/2015 4:43 PM, tuxedomoon wrote: > I'm reindexing Mongo docs into SolrCloud. The new docs have had a few fields > removed so upon reindexing those fields should be gone in Solr. They are > not. So the result is a new doc merged with an old doc rather than a > replacement which is what I n

Reindex of document leaves old fields behind

2015-05-20 Thread tuxedomoon
with my SolrJ client, Solr config or something else. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Reindex-of-document-leaves-old-fields-behind-tp4206710.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.