Same observations here.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Yonik Seeley
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 1:20:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Redhat vs FreeBSD vs other unix flavors
>
&
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 1:08 PM, wojtekpia wrote:
> Thanks Otis. Do you know what the most common deployment OS is? I couldn't
> find much on the mailing list or http://wiki.apache.org/solr/PublicServers
I would guess RHEL (red hat enterprise linux, or CentOS for the free version).
Ubuntu looks l
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
You should be fine on either Linux or FreeBSD (or any other UNIX
flavour). Running on Solaris would probably give you access to
goodness like dtrace, but you can live without it.
There's dtrace on FreeBSD, too.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ _
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Redhat-vs-FreeBSD-vs-other-unix-flavors-tp22251134p22251260.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
is would probably give you access to goodness like dtrace,
> but you can live without it.
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Redhat-vs-FreeBSD-vs-other-unix-flavors-tp22251134p2
pia
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 1:03:13 PM
> Subject: Redhat vs FreeBSD vs other unix flavors
>
>
> Is there a recommended unix flavor for deploying Solr on? I've benchmarked my
> deployment on Red Hat. Our operations team asked if
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Redhat-vs-FreeBSD-vs-other-unix-flavors-tp22251134p22251134.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
