Re: Re[4]: Things are not quite stable...

2007-04-26 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
- Original Message From: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 4:26:41 PM Subject: Re: Re[4]: Things are not quite stable... On Apr 25, 2007, at 3:27 PM, Mike Klaas wrote: > On 4/25/07, Jack L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

Re: Re[4]: Things are not quite stable...

2007-04-25 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Apr 25, 2007, at 3:27 PM, Mike Klaas wrote: On 4/25/07, Jack L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That is understood. For people who are not familiar with Java servlet containers, like myself, the embedded web server takes the least effort to set up. And jetty is supposed be a production quality q

Re: Re[4]: Things are not quite stable...

2007-04-25 Thread Mike Klaas
On 4/25/07, Jack L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That is understood. For people who are not familiar with Java servlet containers, like myself, the embedded web server takes the least effort to set up. And jetty is supposed be a production quality quality package, it'll be great that the default pa

Re[4]: Things are not quite stable...

2007-04-25 Thread Jack L
That is understood. For people who are not familiar with Java servlet containers, like myself, the embedded web server takes the least effort to set up. And jetty is supposed be a production quality quality package, it'll be great that the default package with jetty can be used for production. --