On Feb 20, 2007, at 1:46 PM, Jack L wrote:
The numbers vary quite a bit though, from 13 docs/s (Burkamp)
to 250 docs/s (Walter) to 1000 docs/s I understand the results also
depend
on the doc size and hardware.
my number 1000 was per minute, not second! however, i've done a few
runs toda
Try running your submits while watching a CPU load meter.
Do this on a multi-CPU machine.
If all CPUs are busy, you are running as fast as possible.
If one CPU is busy (around 50% usage on a dual-CPU system),
parallel submits might help.
If no CPU is 100% busy, the bottleneck is probably disk
or
: The numbers vary quite a bit though, from 13 docs/s (Burkamp)
: to 250 docs/s (Walter) to 1000 docs/s I understand the results also depend
: on the doc size and hardware.
It also depends a lot on how much analysis you do of each field ... and
that doesn't even begin to get totheissue of what ki
Thanks to all who replied. It's encouraging :)
The numbers vary quite a bit though, from 13 docs/s (Burkamp)
to 250 docs/s (Walter) to 1000 docs/s I understand the results also depend
on the doc size and hardware.
I have a question for Erik: you mentioned "single threaded indexer"
(below). I'm no
