Thanks a lot. This is what keeps us going :)
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Jeremy Hinegardner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the info. I don't really need it, I was just pondering some
> options.
>
> I noticed, anecdotally, in my logs that it didn't appear to be doing
> database queri
Thanks for the info. I don't really need it, I was just pondering some
options.
I noticed, anecdotally, in my logs that it didn't appear to be doing
database queries concurrently. It just walked the entity list. That
led to the conclusion that if it is doing things serially, it could
reuse a con
Using pooled connection may be of little use here .Because the same
connection is used throughout the operation that is one connection/per
entity. If I use a pooled connection I still need to get the same
no:of connections. That is why we did not have that configuration
If you really need it you ca
